Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) was 10.19 million USD in 2015. ▼ Falling
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) in Kazakhstan, 2009–2015
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in million USD.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) in Kazakhstan is 10.19 million USD, measured in 2015. That is the lowest value across all 7 years on record.
The figure is down 31.1% on the previous year and down 81.4% over ten years.
Kazakhstan ranks 36th of 70 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | million USD | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 54.9 million USD | — |
| 2010 | 52.01 million USD | -5.3% |
| 2011 | 50.1 million USD | -3.7% |
| 2012 | 67.06 million USD | +33.9% |
| 2013 | 36.9 million USD | -45.0% |
| 2014 | 14.79 million USD | -59.9% |
| 2015 | 10.19 million USD | -31.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.9 million USD | 54.9 million USD | 54.9 million USD | 1 |
| 2010s | 38.51 million USD | 10.19 million USD | 67.06 million USD | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 33 Bahrain 12.05 million USD
- 34 Dominican Republic 11.27 million USD compare
- 35 El Salvador 10.94 million USD
- 37 Israel 8.44 million USD compare
- 38 Estonia 8.09 million USD compare
- 39 Azerbaijan 6.56 million USD compare
More environment data for Kazakhstan
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -4.3 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -0.9617 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.801 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 3.29 °C (2025)
- Sawlogs and veneer logs — Production, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (2009)
- Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, annual growth -100 % change on previous year (2009)
- Other industrial roundwood — Production, annual growth rate -17.76 % change on previous year (2024)
- Other industrial roundwood, non-coniferous (production) — Production -23.02 % change on previous year (2024)
- Wood charcoal — Production, annual growth rate 33.33 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) in Kazakhstan?
- Protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) in Kazakhstan was 10.19 million USD in 2015, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 67.06 million USD in 2012.
- What is the lowest protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 10.19 million USD in 2015.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central)?
- Kazakhstan ranks 36th out of 70 countries with data for 2015.
- Is protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 81.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.