Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) in Malawi
Malawi: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) was 0 million USD in 2015. ◆ Volatile
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) in Malawi, 2001–2015
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in million USD.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) in Malawi is 0 million USD, measured in 2015. That is the lowest value across all 15 years on record.
Over the whole period, protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) in Malawi peaked at 3.44 million USD in 2002 and was at its lowest, 0 million USD, in 2003.
That places Malawi 68th out of 70 countries with data for 2015, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) in Malawi, year by year
| Year | million USD | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 2.1 million USD | — |
| 2002 | 3.44 million USD | +63.8% |
| 2003 | 0 million USD | -100.0% |
| 2004 | 0 million USD | — |
| 2005 | 0 million USD | — |
| 2006 | 0 million USD | — |
| 2007 | 0 million USD | — |
| 2008 | 0 million USD | — |
| 2009 | 0 million USD | — |
| 2010 | 0 million USD | — |
| 2011 | 0 million USD | — |
| 2012 | 0 million USD | — |
| 2013 | 0.78 million USD | — |
| 2014 | 0 million USD | -100.0% |
| 2015 | 0 million USD | — |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.6156 million USD | 0 million USD | 3.44 million USD | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.13 million USD | 0 million USD | 0.78 million USD | 6 |
Countries ranked near Malawi
- 65 Albania 0.12 million USD compare
- 66 Angola 0.09 million USD compare
- 67 New Caledonia 0.04 million USD compare
- 68 Canada 0 million USD compare
- 68 Sao Tome and Principe 0 million USD compare
More environment data for Malawi
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -0.9153 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -0.8098 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.254 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.07 °C (2025)
- Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export quantity, annual growth rate -99.97 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export quantity, per unit of GDP 0 m3 per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export quantity, per capita 0 m3 per person (2024)
- Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export value, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sawnwood, non-coniferous — Export value, per unit of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) in Malawi?
- Protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) in Malawi was 0 million USD in 2015, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) recorded in Malawi?
- The highest recorded value was 3.44 million USD in 2002.
- What is the lowest protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) recorded in Malawi?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 million USD in 2003.
- How does Malawi rank for protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central)?
- Malawi ranks 68th out of 70 countries with data for 2015.
- Where does this Malawi data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.