Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) in Poland
Poland: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) was 76.53 million USD in 2023. ▬ Flat
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) in Poland, 2008–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in million USD.
Analysis
In 2023, protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) in Poland stood at 76.53 million USD.
That represents a change of up 4.6% on the previous year and down 22.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) in Poland peaked at 112.07 million USD in 2017 and was at its lowest, 68.34 million USD, in 2021.
Poland ranks 14th of 70 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) in Poland, year by year
| Year | million USD | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 73.14 million USD | — |
| 2009 | 68.95 million USD | -5.7% |
| 2010 | 74.73 million USD | +8.4% |
| 2011 | 85.79 million USD | +14.8% |
| 2012 | 77.18 million USD | -10.0% |
| 2013 | 98.31 million USD | +27.4% |
| 2014 | 74.72 million USD | -24.0% |
| 2015 | 87.01 million USD | +16.4% |
| 2016 | 100.92 million USD | +16.0% |
| 2017 | 112.07 million USD | +11.0% |
| 2018 | 77.08 million USD | -31.2% |
| 2019 | 84.41 million USD | +9.5% |
| 2020 | 69.19 million USD | -18.0% |
| 2021 | 68.34 million USD | -1.2% |
| 2022 | 73.15 million USD | +7.0% |
| 2023 | 76.53 million USD | +4.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.05 million USD | 68.95 million USD | 73.14 million USD | 2 |
| 2010s | 87.22 million USD | 74.72 million USD | 112.07 million USD | 10 |
| 2020s | 71.8 million USD | 68.34 million USD | 76.53 million USD | 4 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More environment data for Poland
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.777 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 2.06 °C (2025)
- Sawnwood — Export quantity, per unit of GDP 0 m3 per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Sawnwood — Export quantity, per capita 0.0244 m3 per person (2024)
- Sawnwood — Export value, annual growth rate 1.02 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sawnwood — Export value, per unit of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Sawnwood — Export value, per capita 0.0106 1000 USD per person (2024)
- Sawnwood, coniferous — Import quantity, annual growth rate -7.77 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sawnwood, coniferous — Import quantity, per unit of GDP 0 m3 per US$ of GDP (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) in Poland?
- Protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) in Poland was 76.53 million USD in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 112.07 million USD in 2017.
- What is the lowest protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 68.34 million USD in 2021.
- How does Poland rank for protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central)?
- Poland ranks 14th out of 70 countries with data for 2023.
- Is protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 22.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.