Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) in South Africa

South Africa: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) was 450.35 million USD in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
450.35 million USD
Change on year
up 8.3%
World rank
3rd
of 70 countries
All-time high
537.03 million USD
in 2018
All-time low
107.14 million USD
in 2001
Years of data
23
2001–2023

Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) in South Africa, 2001–2023

1002003004005002001201220232001: 107.1 million USD2002: 197 million USD2003: 164.4 million USD2004: 285.1 million USD2005: 278.1 million USD2006: 345.7 million USD2007: 336.6 million USD2008: 371.1 million USD2009: 393.5 million USD2010: 377.9 million USD2011: 431.9 million USD2012: 412.6 million USD2013: 435.8 million USD2014: 437.7 million USD2015: 425.3 million USD2016: 467.8 million USD2017: 478.1 million USD2018: 537 million USD2019: 511.1 million USD2020: 530.7 million USD2021: 430.9 million USD2022: 415.9 million USD2023: 450.4 million USD

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in million USD.

Analysis

South Africa recorded 450.35 million USD for protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) in 2023.

That represents a change of up 8.3% on the previous year and up 3.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) in South Africa peaked at 537.03 million USD in 2018 and was at its lowest, 107.14 million USD, in 2001.

South Africa ranks 3rd of 70 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 23 years of available data.

Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) in South Africa, year by year

Annual values for Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices in South Africa, 2001 to 2023.
Year million USD Change
2001 107.14 million USD
2002 196.99 million USD +83.9%
2003 164.45 million USD -16.5%
2004 285.11 million USD +73.4%
2005 278.14 million USD -2.4%
2006 345.67 million USD +24.3%
2007 336.58 million USD -2.6%
2008 371.09 million USD +10.3%
2009 393.54 million USD +6.0%
2010 377.85 million USD -4.0%
2011 431.9 million USD +14.3%
2012 412.57 million USD -4.5%
2013 435.81 million USD +5.6%
2014 437.69 million USD +0.4%
2015 425.27 million USD -2.8%
2016 467.76 million USD +10.0%
2017 478.08 million USD +2.2%
2018 537.03 million USD +12.3%
2019 511.11 million USD -4.8%
2020 530.71 million USD +3.8%
2021 430.87 million USD -18.8%
2022 415.86 million USD -3.5%
2023 450.35 million USD +8.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 275.41 million USD 107.14 million USD 393.54 million USD 9
2010s 451.51 million USD 377.85 million USD 537.03 million USD 10
2020s 456.95 million USD 415.86 million USD 530.71 million USD 4

Countries ranked near South Africa

  1. 1 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 585.92 million USD compare
  2. 1 Republic of Moldova 0.14 million USD compare
  3. 2 Australia 471.06 million USD compare
  4. 2 United Republic of Tanzania 0 million USD compare
  5. 4 Spain 391.8 million USD compare
  6. 5 Italy 352.49 million USD compare
  7. 6 Brazil 319.32 million USD compare

See the full ranking of 72 places →

More environment data for South Africa

All data for South Africa →

Frequently asked questions

What is protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) in South Africa?
Protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) in South Africa was 450.35 million USD in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) recorded in South Africa?
The highest recorded value was 537.03 million USD in 2018.
What is the lowest protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) recorded in South Africa?
The lowest recorded value was 107.14 million USD in 2001.
How does South Africa rank for protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central)?
South Africa ranks 3rd out of 70 countries with data for 2023.
Is protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) rising or falling in South Africa?
Over the last ten years it is up 3.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this South Africa data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) in South Africa. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-recurrent-central-government-expenditure-value-2/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-recurrent-central-government-expenditure-value-2/south-africa/">Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) in South Africa</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
72 places, 873 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.