Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) in South Africa

South Africa: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) was 8,656 million SLC in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
8,656 million SLC
Change on year
up 13.2%
World rank
9th
of 70 countries
All-time high
8,747 million SLC
in 2020
All-time low
549 million SLC
in 2001
Years of data
23
2001–2023

Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) in South Africa, 2001–2023

02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k2001201220232001: 549 million SLC2002: 1.1k million SLC2003: 1.0k million SLC2004: 1.9k million SLC2005: 1.9k million SLC2006: 2.5k million SLC2007: 2.7k million SLC2008: 3.2k million SLC2009: 3.6k million SLC2010: 3.7k million SLC2011: 4.5k million SLC2012: 4.5k million SLC2013: 5.0k million SLC2014: 5.3k million SLC2015: 5.4k million SLC2016: 6.4k million SLC2017: 6.9k million SLC2018: 8.0k million SLC2019: 8.0k million SLC2020: 8.7k million SLC2021: 7.6k million SLC2022: 7.6k million SLC2023: 8.7k million SLC

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in million SLC.

Analysis

In 2023, protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) in South Africa stood at 8,656 million SLC.

That represents a change of up 13.2% on the previous year and up 73.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) in South Africa peaked at 8,747 million SLC in 2020 and was at its lowest, 549 million SLC, in 2001.

South Africa ranks 9th of 70 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) in South Africa, year by year

Annual values for Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency in South Africa, 2001 to 2023.
Year million SLC Change
2001 549 million SLC
2002 1,136 million SLC +106.9%
2003 1,009 million SLC -11.2%
2004 1,855 million SLC +83.8%
2005 1,911 million SLC +3.0%
2006 2,519 million SLC +31.8%
2007 2,655 million SLC +5.4%
2008 3,157 million SLC +18.9%
2009 3,638 million SLC +15.2%
2010 3,707 million SLC +1.9%
2011 4,472 million SLC +20.6%
2012 4,472 million SLC +0.0%
2013 5,000 million SLC +11.8%
2014 5,291 million SLC +5.8%
2015 5,426 million SLC +2.6%
2016 6,383 million SLC +17.6%
2017 6,881 million SLC +7.8%
2018 8,038 million SLC +16.8%
2019 8,003 million SLC -0.4%
2020 8,747 million SLC +9.3%
2021 7,563 million SLC -13.5%
2022 7,647 million SLC +1.1%
2023 8,656 million SLC +13.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2,048 million SLC 549 million SLC 3,638 million SLC 9
2010s 5,767 million SLC 3,707 million SLC 8,038 million SLC 10
2020s 8,153 million SLC 7,563 million SLC 8,747 million SLC 4

Countries ranked near South Africa

  1. 6 Costa Rica 26,690 million SLC compare
  2. 7 Hungary 22,422 million SLC compare
  3. 8 Russian Federation 12,046 million SLC compare
  4. 10 Kenya 7,429 million SLC compare
  5. 11 Chad 2,382 million SLC compare
  6. 12 Kyrgyzstan 2,366 million SLC compare

See the full ranking of 72 places →

More environment data for South Africa

All data for South Africa →

Frequently asked questions

What is protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) in South Africa?
Protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) in South Africa was 8,656 million SLC in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) recorded in South Africa?
The highest recorded value was 8,747 million SLC in 2020.
What is the lowest protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) recorded in South Africa?
The lowest recorded value was 549 million SLC in 2001.
How does South Africa rank for protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central)?
South Africa ranks 9th out of 70 countries with data for 2023.
Is protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) rising or falling in South Africa?
Over the last ten years it is up 73.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this South Africa data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) in South Africa. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-recurrent-central-government-expenditure-value/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-recurrent-central-government-expenditure-value/south-africa/">Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) in South Africa</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
72 places, 873 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.