Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per unit of GDP in Eritrea

Eritrea: Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per unit of GDP was 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in 2011. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2011)
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
Change on year
down 23.0%
World rank
105th
of 143 countries
All-time high
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2000
All-time low
0 m3 per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Years of data
17
1995–2011

Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per unit of GDP in Eritrea, 1995–2011

00001995200320111995: 0 m3 per US$ of GDP1996: 0 m3 per US$ of GDP1997: 0 m3 per US$ of GDP1998: 0 m3 per US$ of GDP1999: 0 m3 per US$ of GDP2000: 0 m3 per US$ of GDP2001: 0 m3 per US$ of GDP2002: 0 m3 per US$ of GDP2003: 0 m3 per US$ of GDP2004: 0 m3 per US$ of GDP2005: 0 m3 per US$ of GDP2006: 0 m3 per US$ of GDP2007: 0 m3 per US$ of GDP2008: 0 m3 per US$ of GDP2009: 0 m3 per US$ of GDP2010: 0 m3 per US$ of GDP2011: 0 m3 per US$ of GDP

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in m3 per US$ of GDP.

Analysis

The most recent figure for sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — production, per unit of gdp in Eritrea is 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, measured in 2011. That is the lowest value across all 17 years on record.

That represents a change of down 23.0% on the previous year and down 83.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — production, per unit of gdp in Eritrea peaked at 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, in 2011.

Eritrea ranks 105th of 143 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per unit of GDP in Eritrea, year by year

Annual values for Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per unit of GDP in Eritrea, 1995 to 2011.
Year m3 per US$ of GDP Change
1995 0 m3 per US$ of GDP
1996 0 m3 per US$ of GDP -8.9%
1997 0 m3 per US$ of GDP -22.4%
1998 0 m3 per US$ of GDP +24.1%
1999 0 m3 per US$ of GDP +12.8%
2000 0 m3 per US$ of GDP +11.0%
2001 0 m3 per US$ of GDP -6.1%
2002 0 m3 per US$ of GDP +3.2%
2003 0 m3 per US$ of GDP -16.2%
2004 0 m3 per US$ of GDP -21.5%
2005 0 m3 per US$ of GDP -53.0%
2006 0 m3 per US$ of GDP -9.3%
2007 0 m3 per US$ of GDP -8.1%
2008 0 m3 per US$ of GDP -4.5%
2009 0 m3 per US$ of GDP -25.7%
2010 0 m3 per US$ of GDP +16.8%
2011 0 m3 per US$ of GDP -23.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0 m3 per US$ of GDP 0 m3 per US$ of GDP 0 m3 per US$ of GDP 5
2000s 0 m3 per US$ of GDP 0 m3 per US$ of GDP 0 m3 per US$ of GDP 10
2010s 0 m3 per US$ of GDP 0 m3 per US$ of GDP 0 m3 per US$ of GDP 2

Countries ranked near Eritrea

  1. 102 Greece 0 m3 per US$ of GDP compare
  2. 103 Austria 0 m3 per US$ of GDP compare
  3. 104 Germany 0 m3 per US$ of GDP compare
  4. 106 Chile 0 m3 per US$ of GDP compare
  5. 107 Zimbabwe 0 m3 per US$ of GDP compare
  6. 108 New Caledonia 0 m3 per US$ of GDP compare

See the full ranking of 144 places →

More environment data for Eritrea

All data for Eritrea →

Frequently asked questions

What is sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — production, per unit of gdp in Eritrea?
Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — production, per unit of gdp in Eritrea was 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in 2011, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — production, per unit of gdp recorded in Eritrea?
The highest recorded value was 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in 2000.
What is the lowest sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — production, per unit of gdp recorded in Eritrea?
The lowest recorded value was 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in 2011.
How does Eritrea rank for sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — production, per unit of gdp?
Eritrea ranks 105th out of 143 countries with data for 2011.
Is sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — production, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Eritrea?
Over the last ten years it is down 83.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Eritrea data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per unit of GDP in Eritrea. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/sawlogs-and-veneer-logs-non-coniferous-production-per-unit-of-gdp/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/sawlogs-and-veneer-logs-non-coniferous-production-per-unit-of-gdp/eritrea/">Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per unit of GDP in Eritrea</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production ÷ GDP (current US$)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production, per unit of GDP
Unit
m3 per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
144 places, 7,511 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Sawlogs and veneer logs, non-coniferous — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.