Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per in Brazil
Brazil: Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per was 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per in Brazil, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kg per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Brazil recorded 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP for swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 13.7% on the previous year and up 32.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per in Brazil peaked at 0.0041 kg per US$ of GDP in 1961 and was at its lowest, 0 kg per US$ of GDP, in 2013.
That places Brazil 32nd out of 149 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per in Brazil, year by year
| Year | kg per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0041 kg per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0.0037 kg per US$ of GDP | -9.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0031 kg per US$ of GDP | -15.6% |
| 1964 | 0.0036 kg per US$ of GDP | +13.5% |
| 1965 | 0.0034 kg per US$ of GDP | -4.6% |
| 1966 | 0.0028 kg per US$ of GDP | -18.8% |
| 1967 | 0.0026 kg per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0024 kg per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 1969 | 0.0022 kg per US$ of GDP | -6.7% |
| 1970 | 0.002 kg per US$ of GDP | -10.2% |
| 1971 | 0.0018 kg per US$ of GDP | -11.5% |
| 1972 | 0.0015 kg per US$ of GDP | -14.8% |
| 1973 | 0.0011 kg per US$ of GDP | -28.1% |
| 1974 | 0.0009 kg per US$ of GDP | -21.1% |
| 1975 | 0.0008 kg per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 1976 | 0.0006 kg per US$ of GDP | -15.6% |
| 1977 | 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP | -14.8% |
| 1978 | 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP | -14.1% |
| 1979 | 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 1980 | 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP | -10.7% |
| 1981 | 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP | -12.7% |
| 1982 | 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP | -2.7% |
| 1983 | 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP | +36.6% |
| 1984 | 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP | +2.8% |
| 1985 | 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 1986 | 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP | -17.0% |
| 1987 | 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP | -9.6% |
| 1988 | 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 1989 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | -23.4% |
| 1990 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | +9.3% |
| 1991 | 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP | +14.6% |
| 1992 | 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP | +5.1% |
| 1993 | 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 1994 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | -27.9% |
| 1995 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -29.9% |
| 1996 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -26.7% |
| 1997 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 1998 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | +3.5% |
| 1999 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | +48.0% |
| 2000 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 2001 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | +20.9% |
| 2002 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | +7.5% |
| 2003 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 2004 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -14.6% |
| 2005 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -22.7% |
| 2006 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -16.9% |
| 2007 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -19.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -15.6% |
| 2009 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | +5.1% |
| 2010 | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | -22.7% |
| 2011 | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | -14.8% |
| 2012 | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | +4.7% |
| 2013 | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | -5.6% |
| 2014 | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | +3.9% |
| 2015 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | +43.0% |
| 2016 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | +1.0% |
| 2017 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -10.1% |
| 2018 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | +7.3% |
| 2019 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | +0.7% |
| 2020 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | +29.0% |
| 2021 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -8.8% |
| 2022 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -10.7% |
| 2023 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -13.7% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 kg per US$ of GDP, 2.8× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0 kg per US$ of GDP, 2.6× the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0031 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0022 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0041 kg per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.001 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.002 kg per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
More environment data for Brazil
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -6.93 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -8.24 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.221 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.36 °C (2025)
- Wood-based panels — Production, annual growth rate 14.48 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual 0.155 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate -2.73 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per in Brazil?
- Swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per in Brazil was 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0041 kg per US$ of GDP in 1961.
- What is the lowest swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kg per US$ of GDP in 2013.
- How does Brazil rank for swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per?
- Brazil ranks 32nd out of 149 countries with data for 2023.
- Is swine — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 32.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Swine — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.