Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP in Ecuador
Ecuador: Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP was 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kg per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP for swine — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit of gdp in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.3% on the previous year and down 35.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, swine — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit of gdp in Ecuador peaked at 0.0139 kg per US$ of GDP in 1962 and was at its lowest, 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP, in 2022.
Ecuador ranks 61st of 149 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | kg per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0115 kg per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0.0139 kg per US$ of GDP | +21.6% |
| 1963 | 0.0122 kg per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 1964 | 0.01 kg per US$ of GDP | -17.8% |
| 1965 | 0.0099 kg per US$ of GDP | -1.6% |
| 1966 | 0.0102 kg per US$ of GDP | +3.3% |
| 1967 | 0.0102 kg per US$ of GDP | -0.3% |
| 1968 | 0.0105 kg per US$ of GDP | +3.5% |
| 1969 | 0.0089 kg per US$ of GDP | -15.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0101 kg per US$ of GDP | +12.5% |
| 1971 | 0.0108 kg per US$ of GDP | +7.2% |
| 1972 | 0.0096 kg per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 1973 | 0.0085 kg per US$ of GDP | -12.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0054 kg per US$ of GDP | -36.6% |
| 1975 | 0.0049 kg per US$ of GDP | -8.2% |
| 1976 | 0.0045 kg per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 1977 | 0.004 kg per US$ of GDP | -11.5% |
| 1978 | 0.004 kg per US$ of GDP | -0.7% |
| 1979 | 0.0036 kg per US$ of GDP | -9.6% |
| 1980 | 0.003 kg per US$ of GDP | -16.9% |
| 1981 | 0.0023 kg per US$ of GDP | -23.4% |
| 1982 | 0.0027 kg per US$ of GDP | +16.1% |
| 1983 | 0.0033 kg per US$ of GDP | +23.3% |
| 1984 | 0.0034 kg per US$ of GDP | +3.0% |
| 1985 | 0.0022 kg per US$ of GDP | -35.9% |
| 1986 | 0.0018 kg per US$ of GDP | -16.3% |
| 1987 | 0.0017 kg per US$ of GDP | -3.4% |
| 1988 | 0.0022 kg per US$ of GDP | +26.8% |
| 1989 | 0.0023 kg per US$ of GDP | +2.3% |
| 1990 | 0.0022 kg per US$ of GDP | -3.3% |
| 1991 | 0.0021 kg per US$ of GDP | -6.0% |
| 1992 | 0.002 kg per US$ of GDP | -2.2% |
| 1993 | 0.0019 kg per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 1994 | 0.0017 kg per US$ of GDP | -13.7% |
| 1995 | 0.0016 kg per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 1996 | 0.0016 kg per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 1997 | 0.0014 kg per US$ of GDP | -7.5% |
| 1998 | 0.0015 kg per US$ of GDP | +0.7% |
| 1999 | 0.0016 kg per US$ of GDP | +11.4% |
| 2000 | 0.0013 kg per US$ of GDP | -19.2% |
| 2001 | 0.0009 kg per US$ of GDP | -30.4% |
| 2002 | 0.0008 kg per US$ of GDP | -13.0% |
| 2003 | 0.0007 kg per US$ of GDP | -13.7% |
| 2004 | 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP | -20.0% |
| 2005 | 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP | -12.7% |
| 2006 | 0.0006 kg per US$ of GDP | +31.6% |
| 2007 | 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP | -36.6% |
| 2008 | 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP | -32.4% |
| 2009 | 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP | +30.4% |
| 2010 | 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP | -6.6% |
| 2011 | 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP | +6.0% |
| 2012 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | -42.9% |
| 2013 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | -4.7% |
| 2014 | 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP | +47.4% |
| 2015 | 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP | -9.4% |
| 2016 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | -30.6% |
| 2017 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 2018 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | +11.8% |
| 2019 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | -9.5% |
| 2020 | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | +2.3% |
| 2021 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -11.1% |
| 2022 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | -17.4% |
| 2023 | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | +0.3% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP, 1.1× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP, 1.1× the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0108 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0089 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0139 kg per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0065 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0036 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0108 kg per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0025 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0017 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0034 kg per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0018 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0014 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0022 kg per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0006 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0013 kg per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More environment data for Ecuador
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly 0.3767 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -1.05 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.4 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.49 °C (2025)
- Wood-based panels — Production, annual growth rate -0.5742 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual 1.65 % change on previous year (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate -1.14 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is swine — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit of gdp in Ecuador?
- Swine — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit of gdp in Ecuador was 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest swine — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit of gdp recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0139 kg per US$ of GDP in 1962.
- What is the lowest swine — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit of gdp recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP in 2022.
- How does Ecuador rank for swine — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit of gdp?
- Ecuador ranks 61st out of 149 countries with data for 2023.
- Is swine — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit of gdp rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 35.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Swine — Manure management Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Swine — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.