Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Kiribati

Kiribati: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population was 96.1% in 2024. ▲ Rising

Latest (2024)
96.1%
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
159th
of 188 countries
All-time high
96.1%
in 2022
All-time low
73.6%
in 2000
Years of data
25
2000–2024

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Kiribati, 2000–2024

0204060801002000201220242000: 73.6 %2001: 74.6 %2002: 75.7 %2003: 76.7 %2004: 77.7 %2005: 78.7 %2006: 79.8 %2007: 80.8 %2008: 81.8 %2009: 82.8 %2010: 83.8 %2011: 84.9 %2012: 85.9 %2013: 86.9 %2014: 87.9 %2015: 89 %2016: 90 %2017: 91 %2018: 92 %2019: 93 %2020: 94.1 %2021: 95.1 %2022: 96.1 %2023: 96.1 %2024: 96.1 %

Source: WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in %.

Analysis

In 2024, using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Kiribati stood at 96.1%. That is the highest value across all 25 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 9.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Kiribati peaked at 96.1% in 2022 and was at its lowest, 73.6%, in 2000.

That places Kiribati 159th out of 188 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 25 years of available data.

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Kiribati, year by year

Annual values for Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Kiribati, 2000 to 2024.
Year % Change
2000 73.6% —
2001 74.6% +1.4%
2002 75.7% +1.4%
2003 76.7% +1.4%
2004 77.7% +1.3%
2005 78.7% +1.3%
2006 79.8% +1.3%
2007 80.8% +1.3%
2008 81.8% +1.3%
2009 82.8% +1.3%
2010 83.8% +1.2%
2011 84.9% +1.2%
2012 85.9% +1.2%
2013 86.9% +1.2%
2014 87.9% +1.2%
2015 89.0% +1.2%
2016 90.0% +1.1%
2017 91.0% +1.1%
2018 92.0% +1.1%
2019 93.0% +1.1%
2020 94.1% +1.1%
2021 95.1% +1.1%
2022 96.1% +1.1%
2023 96.1% +0.0%
2024 96.1% +0.0%

Kiribati compared with similar countries

  • Kiribati's 96.1% is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 98.5%, 98% of the median. (44 countries reporting)
  • Kiribati's 96.1% is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 99.4%, 97% of the median. (28 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 78.2% 73.6% 82.8% 10
2010s 88.4% 83.8% 93.0% 10
2020s 95.5% 94.1% 96.1% 5

Countries ranked near Kiribati

  1. 156 Liberia 96.6% compare
  2. 157 Eritrea 96.5% compare
  3. 158 Senegal 96.3% compare
  4. 160 Myanmar 96.0% compare
  5. 161 Malawi 96.0% compare
  6. 162 Tajikistan 95.8% compare

See the full ranking of 188 places →

More environment data for Kiribati

All data for Kiribati →

Frequently asked questions

What is using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Kiribati?
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Kiribati was 96.1% in 2024, according to WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population recorded in Kiribati?
The highest recorded value was 96.1% in 2022.
What is the lowest using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population recorded in Kiribati?
The lowest recorded value was 73.6% in 2000.
How does Kiribati rank for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Kiribati ranks 159th out of 188 countries with data for 2024.
Is using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population rising or falling in Kiribati?
Over the last ten years it is up 9.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Kiribati data come from?
The figures come from WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 25 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Kiribati. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/kiribati/">Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Kiribati</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.