Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Uganda

Uganda: Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population was 92.7% in 2024. ▬ Flat

Latest (2024)
92.7%
Change on year
up 0.1%
World rank
173rd
of 188 countries
All-time high
92.7%
in 2024
All-time low
91.3%
in 2000
Years of data
25
2000–2024

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Uganda, 2000–2024

0204060801002000201220242000: 91.3 %2001: 91.3 %2002: 91.4 %2003: 91.5 %2004: 91.5 %2005: 91.6 %2006: 91.6 %2007: 91.7 %2008: 91.8 %2009: 91.8 %2010: 91.9 %2011: 91.9 %2012: 92 %2013: 92.1 %2014: 92.1 %2015: 92.2 %2016: 92.2 %2017: 92.3 %2018: 92.4 %2019: 92.4 %2020: 92.5 %2021: 92.5 %2022: 92.6 %2023: 92.7 %2024: 92.7 %

Source: WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in %.

Analysis

Uganda recorded 92.7% for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in 2024. That is the highest value across all 25 years on record.

The figure is up 0.1% on the previous year and up 0.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Uganda peaked at 92.7% in 2024 and was at its lowest, 91.3%, in 2000.

Uganda ranks 173rd of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Uganda, year by year

Annual values for Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Uganda, 2000 to 2024.
Year % Change
2000 91.3% —
2001 91.3% +0.1%
2002 91.4% +0.1%
2003 91.5% +0.1%
2004 91.5% +0.1%
2005 91.6% +0.1%
2006 91.6% +0.1%
2007 91.7% +0.1%
2008 91.8% +0.1%
2009 91.8% +0.1%
2010 91.9% +0.1%
2011 91.9% +0.1%
2012 92.0% +0.1%
2013 92.1% +0.1%
2014 92.1% +0.1%
2015 92.2% +0.1%
2016 92.2% +0.1%
2017 92.3% +0.1%
2018 92.4% +0.1%
2019 92.4% +0.1%
2020 92.5% +0.1%
2021 92.5% +0.1%
2022 92.6% +0.1%
2023 92.7% +0.1%
2024 92.7% +0.1%

Uganda compared with similar countries

  • Uganda's 92.7% is below the median for low income countries, which is 96.0%, 97% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
  • Uganda's 92.7% is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 96.6%, 96% of the median. (47 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 91.6% 91.3% 91.8% 10
2010s 92.2% 91.9% 92.4% 10
2020s 92.6% 92.5% 92.7% 5

Countries ranked near Uganda

  1. 170 Zambia 93.9% compare
  2. 171 Mozambique 93.8% compare
  3. 172 Haiti 92.8% compare
  4. 174 Cote d'Ivoire 92.5% compare
  5. 175 Sierra Leone 92.3% compare
  6. 176 Kenya 92.2% compare

See the full ranking of 188 places →

More environment data for Uganda

All data for Uganda →

Frequently asked questions

What is using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Uganda?
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Uganda was 92.7% in 2024, according to WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population recorded in Uganda?
The highest recorded value was 92.7% in 2024.
What is the lowest using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population recorded in Uganda?
The lowest recorded value was 91.3% in 2000.
How does Uganda rank for using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population?
Uganda ranks 173rd out of 188 countries with data for 2024.
Is using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population rising or falling in Uganda?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Uganda data come from?
The figures come from WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 25 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Uganda. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/urban-improved-water-access-vs-rural-water-access/uganda/">Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population in Uganda</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Using improved water sources: urban vs. rural population
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 4,631 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people who use an improved drinking water source, regardless of collection time. An improved drinking water source is a safely designed drinking water source and includes e.g. piped water, boreholes or tubewells and packaged or delivered water.