Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Hungary

Hungary: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard was 0.1266 million SLC per person in 2024. ▲ Rising

Latest (2024)
0.1266 million SLC per person
Change on year
down 9.9%
World rank
33rd
of 180 countries
All-time high
0.1627 million SLC per person
in 2008
All-time low
0.0886 million SLC per person
in 1970
Years of data
55
1970–2024

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Hungary, 1970–2024

00.050.10.15197019972024

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in million SLC per person.

Analysis

In 2024, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Hungary stood at 0.1266 million SLC per person.

The figure is down 9.9% on the previous year and down 6.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Hungary peaked at 0.1627 million SLC per person in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0.0886 million SLC per person, in 1970.

That places Hungary 33rd out of 180 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 55 years of available data.

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Hungary, year by year

Annual values for Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita in Hungary, 1970 to 2024.
Year million SLC per person Change
1970 0.0886 million SLC per person
1971 0.0942 million SLC per person +6.3%
1972 0.0965 million SLC per person +2.4%
1973 0.1014 million SLC per person +5.2%
1974 0.104 million SLC per person +2.5%
1975 0.1058 million SLC per person +1.7%
1976 0.1009 million SLC per person -4.6%
1977 0.1145 million SLC per person +13.5%
1978 0.1143 million SLC per person -0.1%
1979 0.112 million SLC per person -2.1%
1980 0.1173 million SLC per person +4.7%
1981 0.1212 million SLC per person +3.3%
1982 0.1354 million SLC per person +11.7%
1983 0.1357 million SLC per person +0.2%
1984 0.1422 million SLC per person +4.8%
1985 0.1367 million SLC per person -3.9%
1986 0.1417 million SLC per person +3.7%
1987 0.1377 million SLC per person -2.8%
1988 0.1488 million SLC per person +8.0%
1989 0.1486 million SLC per person -0.1%
1990 0.1431 million SLC per person -3.7%
1991 0.1314 million SLC per person -8.2%
1992 0.1097 million SLC per person -16.5%
1993 0.1011 million SLC per person -7.8%
1994 0.1008 million SLC per person -0.3%
1995 0.1037 million SLC per person +2.8%
1996 0.1089 million SLC per person +5.0%
1997 0.1054 million SLC per person -3.2%
1998 0.1099 million SLC per person +4.3%
1999 0.1132 million SLC per person +3.0%
2000 0.1022 million SLC per person -9.8%
2001 0.1151 million SLC per person +12.7%
2002 0.0977 million SLC per person -15.1%
2003 0.0979 million SLC per person +0.2%
2004 0.1473 million SLC per person +50.4%
2005 0.1391 million SLC per person -5.6%
2006 0.1305 million SLC per person -6.2%
2007 0.1045 million SLC per person -19.9%
2008 0.1627 million SLC per person +55.7%
2009 0.1407 million SLC per person -13.5%
2010 0.1098 million SLC per person -22.0%
2011 0.1283 million SLC per person +16.9%
2012 0.1015 million SLC per person -20.9%
2013 0.1171 million SLC per person +15.4%
2014 0.1355 million SLC per person +15.6%
2015 0.1343 million SLC per person -0.8%
2016 0.1524 million SLC per person +13.5%
2017 0.1431 million SLC per person -6.1%
2018 0.1508 million SLC per person +5.4%
2019 0.1486 million SLC per person -1.5%
2020 0.1365 million SLC per person -8.1%
2021 0.1392 million SLC per person +2.0%
2022 0.1026 million SLC per person -26.3%
2023 0.1406 million SLC per person +37.1%
2024 0.1266 million SLC per person -9.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 0.1032 million SLC per person 0.0886 million SLC per person 0.1145 million SLC per person 10
1980s 0.1365 million SLC per person 0.1173 million SLC per person 0.1488 million SLC per person 10
1990s 0.1127 million SLC per person 0.1008 million SLC per person 0.1431 million SLC per person 10
2000s 0.1238 million SLC per person 0.0977 million SLC per person 0.1627 million SLC per person 10
2010s 0.1321 million SLC per person 0.1015 million SLC per person 0.1524 million SLC per person 10
2020s 0.1291 million SLC per person 0.1026 million SLC per person 0.1406 million SLC per person 5

Countries ranked near Hungary

  1. 30 Senegal 0.1302 million SLC per person compare
  2. 31 Kazakhstan 0.1291 million SLC per person compare
  3. 32 Albania 0.1267 million SLC per person compare
  4. 34 Togo 0.1201 million SLC per person compare
  5. 35 Nigeria 0.1034 million SLC per person compare
  6. 36 Central African Republic 0.0945 million SLC per person compare

See the full ranking of 180 places →

More environment data for Hungary

All data for Hungary →

Frequently asked questions

What is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Hungary?
Value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Hungary was 0.1266 million SLC per person in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Hungary?
The highest recorded value was 0.1627 million SLC per person in 2008.
What is the lowest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Hungary?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0886 million SLC per person in 1970.
How does Hungary rank for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Hungary ranks 33rd out of 180 countries with data for 2024.
Is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard rising or falling in Hungary?
Over the last ten years it is down 6.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Hungary data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Hungary. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/stat/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-2/hungary/">Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Hungary</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices ÷ Population, total

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 9,311 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.