Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Philippines
Philippines: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard was 0.0139 million SLC per person in 2024. ▬ Flat
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Philippines, 1970–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in million SLC per person.
Analysis
In 2024, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Philippines stood at 0.0139 million SLC per person.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 2.3% on the previous year and down 5.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Philippines peaked at 0.0152 million SLC per person in 1981 and was at its lowest, 0.0112 million SLC per person, in 1998.
Philippines ranks 62nd of 180 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Philippines, year by year
| Year | million SLC per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.0131 million SLC per person | — |
| 1971 | 0.0133 million SLC per person | +1.5% |
| 1972 | 0.0138 million SLC per person | +3.1% |
| 1973 | 0.0145 million SLC per person | +5.1% |
| 1974 | 0.0136 million SLC per person | -5.9% |
| 1975 | 0.0135 million SLC per person | -0.9% |
| 1976 | 0.0145 million SLC per person | +7.5% |
| 1977 | 0.0147 million SLC per person | +1.6% |
| 1978 | 0.0148 million SLC per person | +0.8% |
| 1979 | 0.0149 million SLC per person | +0.3% |
| 1980 | 0.0151 million SLC per person | +1.2% |
| 1981 | 0.0152 million SLC per person | +1.0% |
| 1982 | 0.0149 million SLC per person | -2.3% |
| 1983 | 0.0139 million SLC per person | -6.7% |
| 1984 | 0.0134 million SLC per person | -3.3% |
| 1985 | 0.0128 million SLC per person | -4.4% |
| 1986 | 0.013 million SLC per person | +1.0% |
| 1987 | 0.013 million SLC per person | +0.4% |
| 1988 | 0.013 million SLC per person | +0.2% |
| 1989 | 0.0131 million SLC per person | +0.2% |
| 1990 | 0.0128 million SLC per person | -2.3% |
| 1991 | 0.0126 million SLC per person | -0.9% |
| 1992 | 0.0124 million SLC per person | -2.0% |
| 1993 | 0.0123 million SLC per person | -0.3% |
| 1994 | 0.0124 million SLC per person | +0.3% |
| 1995 | 0.0122 million SLC per person | -1.6% |
| 1996 | 0.0123 million SLC per person | +1.3% |
| 1997 | 0.0124 million SLC per person | +0.5% |
| 1998 | 0.0112 million SLC per person | -9.3% |
| 1999 | 0.012 million SLC per person | +6.9% |
| 2000 | 0.0121 million SLC per person | +1.0% |
| 2001 | 0.0123 million SLC per person | +1.6% |
| 2002 | 0.0125 million SLC per person | +1.5% |
| 2003 | 0.0128 million SLC per person | +2.5% |
| 2004 | 0.0132 million SLC per person | +3.0% |
| 2005 | 0.0134 million SLC per person | +1.6% |
| 2006 | 0.0138 million SLC per person | +2.8% |
| 2007 | 0.0143 million SLC per person | +3.6% |
| 2008 | 0.0145 million SLC per person | +1.6% |
| 2009 | 0.0142 million SLC per person | -1.9% |
| 2010 | 0.0141 million SLC per person | -0.7% |
| 2011 | 0.0143 million SLC per person | +1.4% |
| 2012 | 0.0145 million SLC per person | +1.1% |
| 2013 | 0.0146 million SLC per person | +1.0% |
| 2014 | 0.0147 million SLC per person | +0.2% |
| 2015 | 0.0146 million SLC per person | -0.7% |
| 2016 | 0.0142 million SLC per person | -2.3% |
| 2017 | 0.0146 million SLC per person | +2.9% |
| 2018 | 0.0146 million SLC per person | -0.1% |
| 2019 | 0.0146 million SLC per person | -0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.0144 million SLC per person | -1.3% |
| 2021 | 0.0143 million SLC per person | -1.2% |
| 2022 | 0.0142 million SLC per person | -0.3% |
| 2023 | 0.0143 million SLC per person | +0.4% |
| 2024 | 0.0139 million SLC per person | -2.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0141 million SLC per person | 0.0131 million SLC per person | 0.0149 million SLC per person | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0137 million SLC per person | 0.0128 million SLC per person | 0.0152 million SLC per person | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0123 million SLC per person | 0.0112 million SLC per person | 0.0128 million SLC per person | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0133 million SLC per person | 0.0121 million SLC per person | 0.0145 million SLC per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0145 million SLC per person | 0.0141 million SLC per person | 0.0147 million SLC per person | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0142 million SLC per person | 0.0139 million SLC per person | 0.0144 million SLC per person | 5 |
Countries ranked near Philippines
- 59 Bangladesh 0.0197 million SLC per person compare
- 60 Thailand 0.019 million SLC per person compare
- 61 Mauritius 0.0148 million SLC per person compare
- 63 Mauritania 0.0109 million SLC per person compare
- 64 Nicaragua 0.0104 million SLC per person compare
- 65 Czechia 0.0097 million SLC per person compare
More environment data for Philippines
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly 6.85 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly 7.07 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.177 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 0.905 °C (2025)
- Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 5.09 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 0.0207 million SLC per person (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual 2.05 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit 0 million USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Philippines?
- Value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Philippines was 0.0139 million SLC per person in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Philippines?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0152 million SLC per person in 1981.
- What is the lowest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Philippines?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0112 million SLC per person in 1998.
- How does Philippines rank for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
- Philippines ranks 62nd out of 180 countries with data for 2024.
- Is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard rising or falling in Philippines?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Philippines data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.