Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Belgium
Belgium: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Belgium, 1970–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in million SLC per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Belgium is 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.8% on the previous year and down 11.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Belgium peaked at 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 1970 and was at its lowest, 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP, in 2023.
Belgium ranks 167th of 179 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Belgium, year by year
| Year | million SLC per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1971 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
| 1972 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -20.3% |
| 1973 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -19.1% |
| 1974 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -11.1% |
| 1975 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -29.0% |
| 1976 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -11.3% |
| 1977 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 1978 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -8.3% |
| 1979 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -13.3% |
| 1980 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 1981 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +26.6% |
| 1982 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +20.7% |
| 1983 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +3.5% |
| 1984 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +14.3% |
| 1985 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -3.6% |
| 1986 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -24.7% |
| 1987 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -24.7% |
| 1988 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 1989 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
| 1990 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -22.6% |
| 1991 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +3.7% |
| 1992 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -1.1% |
| 1993 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +9.6% |
| 1994 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -14.1% |
| 1995 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 1996 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +3.2% |
| 1997 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +13.6% |
| 1998 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +0.9% |
| 1999 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
| 2000 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +16.3% |
| 2001 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -7.1% |
| 2002 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +1.1% |
| 2003 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -21.4% |
| 2004 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 2005 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -6.9% |
| 2006 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +2.9% |
| 2007 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -13.5% |
| 2008 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -8.4% |
| 2009 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +11.9% |
| 2010 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +9.3% |
| 2011 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -8.2% |
| 2012 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +7.8% |
| 2013 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -13.1% |
| 2014 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +4.8% |
| 2015 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +34.3% |
| 2016 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -9.9% |
| 2017 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -0.7% |
| 2018 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -16.1% |
| 2019 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +5.7% |
| 2020 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -2.5% |
| 2021 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -12.3% |
| 2022 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +2.2% |
| 2023 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -7.2% |
| 2024 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +2.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Belgium
- 164 Germany 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
- 165 Puerto Rico 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
- 166 Bahamas 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
- 168 Switzerland 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
- 169 Andorra 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
- 170 Cayman Islands 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
More environment data for Belgium
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -5.46 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -6.46 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.574 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 2.19 °C (2025)
- Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 7.21 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 0.0004 million SLC per person (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual 7.32 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit 0 million USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Belgium?
- Value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Belgium was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Belgium?
- The highest recorded value was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 1970.
- What is the lowest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Belgium?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2023.
- How does Belgium rank for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
- Belgium ranks 167th out of 179 countries with data for 2024.
- Is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard rising or falling in Belgium?
- Over the last ten years it is down 11.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belgium data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.