Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Kuwait
Kuwait: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Kuwait, 1970–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in million SLC per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Kuwait is 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of up 6.6% on the previous year and up 28.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Kuwait peaked at 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 1970 and was at its lowest, 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP, in 2008.
That places Kuwait 173rd out of 179 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Kuwait, year by year
| Year | million SLC per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1971 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -19.8% |
| 1972 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -26.2% |
| 1973 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -25.2% |
| 1974 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -54.3% |
| 1975 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +18.0% |
| 1976 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -8.4% |
| 1977 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -14.9% |
| 1978 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +7.8% |
| 1979 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -42.2% |
| 1980 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 1981 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +84.6% |
| 1982 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +5.1% |
| 1983 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -2.1% |
| 1984 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +49.6% |
| 1985 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +48.2% |
| 1986 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +22.7% |
| 1987 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -21.9% |
| 1988 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +0.2% |
| 1989 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +23.2% |
| 1990 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +30.5% |
| 1991 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -67.8% |
| 1992 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -9.2% |
| 1993 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +25.1% |
| 1994 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +51.4% |
| 1995 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 1996 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -18.2% |
| 1997 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +5.4% |
| 1998 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +37.3% |
| 1999 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -18.7% |
| 2000 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -30.3% |
| 2001 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +31.8% |
| 2002 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +6.1% |
| 2003 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -14.8% |
| 2004 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -19.5% |
| 2005 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -28.8% |
| 2006 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -41.5% |
| 2007 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -3.8% |
| 2008 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -34.1% |
| 2009 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +78.8% |
| 2010 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +105.1% |
| 2011 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -17.1% |
| 2012 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 2013 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +0.5% |
| 2014 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +14.9% |
| 2015 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +34.7% |
| 2016 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +5.3% |
| 2017 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -3.7% |
| 2018 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -16.1% |
| 2019 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 2020 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +21.4% |
| 2021 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 2022 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -15.9% |
| 2023 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +16.4% |
| 2024 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +6.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Kuwait
- 170 Cayman Islands 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
- 171 Bermuda 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
- 172 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
- 174 Liechtenstein 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
- 175 Luxembourg 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
- 176 Bahrain 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
More environment data for Kuwait
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -57.51 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -61.88 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.516 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.95 °C (2025)
- Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 1.73 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 0 million SLC per person (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual 1.89 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit 0 million USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Kuwait?
- Value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Kuwait was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Kuwait?
- The highest recorded value was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 1970.
- What is the lowest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Kuwait?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2008.
- How does Kuwait rank for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
- Kuwait ranks 173rd out of 179 countries with data for 2024.
- Is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard rising or falling in Kuwait?
- Over the last ten years it is up 28.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kuwait data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.