Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Nicaragua
Nicaragua: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard was -2.13 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Nicaragua, 1971–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Nicaragua recorded -2.13 % change on previous year for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in 2023.
The figure is down 235.8% on the previous year and down 3.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Nicaragua peaked at 12.06 % change on previous year in 2000 and was at its lowest, -19.04 % change on previous year, in 1980.
That places Nicaragua 166th out of 206 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Nicaragua, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | 7.79 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | 0.5102 % change on previous year | -93.5% |
| 1973 | 6.49 % change on previous year | +1172.8% |
| 1974 | 9.16 % change on previous year | +41.0% |
| 1975 | 5.65 % change on previous year | -38.3% |
| 1976 | 1.24 % change on previous year | -78.1% |
| 1977 | 3.57 % change on previous year | +187.9% |
| 1978 | 6.47 % change on previous year | +81.1% |
| 1979 | -15.37 % change on previous year | -337.7% |
| 1980 | -19.04 % change on previous year | +23.9% |
| 1981 | 9.52 % change on previous year | -150.0% |
| 1982 | 2.83 % change on previous year | -70.3% |
| 1983 | 5.77 % change on previous year | +104.1% |
| 1984 | -5.34 % change on previous year | -192.6% |
| 1985 | -4.8 % change on previous year | -10.1% |
| 1986 | -8.77 % change on previous year | +82.7% |
| 1987 | -3.25 % change on previous year | -63.0% |
| 1988 | -10.15 % change on previous year | +212.8% |
| 1989 | 9.19 % change on previous year | -190.5% |
| 1990 | 0.2033 % change on previous year | -97.8% |
| 1991 | -3.9 % change on previous year | -2016.3% |
| 1992 | 3.06 % change on previous year | -178.5% |
| 1993 | 1.82 % change on previous year | -40.5% |
| 1994 | 10.94 % change on previous year | +501.5% |
| 1995 | 8.69 % change on previous year | -20.6% |
| 1996 | 9.42 % change on previous year | +8.5% |
| 1997 | -0.7705 % change on previous year | -108.2% |
| 1998 | -0.2659 % change on previous year | -65.5% |
| 1999 | 6.07 % change on previous year | -2382.3% |
| 2000 | 12.06 % change on previous year | +98.8% |
| 2001 | 2.68 % change on previous year | -77.8% |
| 2002 | -0.2567 % change on previous year | -109.6% |
| 2003 | 1.95 % change on previous year | -858.0% |
| 2004 | 5.71 % change on previous year | +193.4% |
| 2005 | 4.62 % change on previous year | -19.0% |
| 2006 | 2.47 % change on previous year | -46.6% |
| 2007 | 11.78 % change on previous year | +376.9% |
| 2008 | 1.13 % change on previous year | -90.4% |
| 2009 | 1.07 % change on previous year | -5.8% |
| 2010 | 2.51 % change on previous year | +136.0% |
| 2011 | 5.71 % change on previous year | +127.3% |
| 2012 | -0.4418 % change on previous year | -107.7% |
| 2013 | -2.06 % change on previous year | +365.5% |
| 2014 | 2.11 % change on previous year | -202.4% |
| 2015 | -0.6502 % change on previous year | -130.9% |
| 2016 | 4.8 % change on previous year | -838.0% |
| 2017 | 9.2 % change on previous year | +91.8% |
| 2018 | 1.04 % change on previous year | -88.7% |
| 2019 | 3.96 % change on previous year | +280.9% |
| 2020 | 0.0643 % change on previous year | -98.4% |
| 2021 | 6.25 % change on previous year | +9615.5% |
| 2022 | 1.57 % change on previous year | -74.9% |
| 2023 | -2.13 % change on previous year | -235.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 2.83 % change on previous year | -15.37 % change on previous year | 9.16 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1980s | -2.41 % change on previous year | -19.04 % change on previous year | 9.52 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.53 % change on previous year | -3.9 % change on previous year | 10.94 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.32 % change on previous year | -0.2567 % change on previous year | 12.06 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.62 % change on previous year | -2.06 % change on previous year | 9.2 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.44 % change on previous year | -2.13 % change on previous year | 6.25 % change on previous year | 4 |
Countries ranked near Nicaragua
- 163 Japan -2.01 % change on previous year compare
- 164 North Macedonia -2.04 % change on previous year compare
- 165 Barbados -2.06 % change on previous year compare
- 167 Mexico -2.3 % change on previous year compare
- 168 Israel -2.31 % change on previous year compare
- 169 Namibia -2.67 % change on previous year compare
More environment data for Nicaragua
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly 3.64 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly 4.53 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Standard Deviation 0.243 °C (2024)
- Temperature change 1.89 °C (2024)
- Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2022)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 7.42 % change on previous year (2023)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 0.0146 million SLC per person (2023)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual 5.75 % change on previous year (2023)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit 0 million USD per US$ of GDP (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Nicaragua?
- Value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Nicaragua was -2.13 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Nicaragua?
- The highest recorded value was 12.06 % change on previous year in 2000.
- What is the lowest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Nicaragua?
- The lowest recorded value was -19.04 % change on previous year in 1980.
- How does Nicaragua rank for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
- Nicaragua ranks 166th out of 206 countries with data for 2023.
- Is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard rising or falling in Nicaragua?
- Over the last ten years it is down 3.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Nicaragua data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.