Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Zambia
Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard was -0.2801 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Zambia, 1971–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Zambia is -0.2801 % change on previous year, measured in 2024.
The figure is up 77.2% on the previous year and up 96.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Zambia peaked at 272.92 % change on previous year in 1993 and was at its lowest, -47.81 % change on previous year, in 2018.
That places Zambia 178th out of 214 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Zambia, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | 13.58 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | 31.52 % change on previous year | +132.1% |
| 1973 | -4.96 % change on previous year | -115.7% |
| 1974 | 12.17 % change on previous year | -345.5% |
| 1975 | 25.58 % change on previous year | +110.1% |
| 1976 | 37.65 % change on previous year | +47.2% |
| 1977 | 0.8968 % change on previous year | -97.6% |
| 1978 | 1.33 % change on previous year | +48.7% |
| 1979 | 3.51 % change on previous year | +163.2% |
| 1980 | 21.61 % change on previous year | +515.9% |
| 1981 | 14.29 % change on previous year | -33.9% |
| 1982 | 19.82 % change on previous year | +38.7% |
| 1983 | 30.79 % change on previous year | +55.4% |
| 1984 | 21.6 % change on previous year | -29.9% |
| 1985 | 30.72 % change on previous year | +42.3% |
| 1986 | 141 % change on previous year | +359.0% |
| 1987 | 19.2 % change on previous year | -86.4% |
| 1988 | 66.38 % change on previous year | +245.8% |
| 1989 | 63.64 % change on previous year | -4.1% |
| 1990 | 121.83 % change on previous year | +91.4% |
| 1991 | 98.46 % change on previous year | -19.2% |
| 1992 | 250.92 % change on previous year | +154.8% |
| 1993 | 272.92 % change on previous year | +8.8% |
| 1994 | -35.92 % change on previous year | -113.2% |
| 1995 | 60.1 % change on previous year | -267.3% |
| 1996 | 24.66 % change on previous year | -59.0% |
| 1997 | 36.88 % change on previous year | +49.6% |
| 1998 | 32.17 % change on previous year | -12.8% |
| 1999 | 41.47 % change on previous year | +28.9% |
| 2000 | 22.32 % change on previous year | -46.2% |
| 2001 | 26.91 % change on previous year | +20.6% |
| 2002 | 23.44 % change on previous year | -12.9% |
| 2003 | 27.87 % change on previous year | +18.9% |
| 2004 | 27.84 % change on previous year | -0.1% |
| 2005 | 17.12 % change on previous year | -38.5% |
| 2006 | 11.88 % change on previous year | -30.6% |
| 2007 | 12.2 % change on previous year | +2.7% |
| 2008 | 12.82 % change on previous year | +5.1% |
| 2009 | 16.29 % change on previous year | +27.0% |
| 2010 | 2.49 % change on previous year | -84.7% |
| 2011 | 20.12 % change on previous year | +707.2% |
| 2012 | 11.23 % change on previous year | -44.2% |
| 2013 | 1.74 % change on previous year | -84.5% |
| 2014 | -9.03 % change on previous year | -619.6% |
| 2015 | -19.35 % change on previous year | +114.4% |
| 2016 | 47.36 % change on previous year | -344.7% |
| 2017 | 30.89 % change on previous year | -34.8% |
| 2018 | -47.81 % change on previous year | -254.8% |
| 2019 | -6.51 % change on previous year | -86.4% |
| 2020 | 15.07 % change on previous year | -331.4% |
| 2021 | 38.75 % change on previous year | +157.1% |
| 2022 | 24.57 % change on previous year | -36.6% |
| 2023 | -1.23 % change on previous year | -105.0% |
| 2024 | -0.2801 % change on previous year | -77.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 13.48 % change on previous year | -4.96 % change on previous year | 37.65 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1980s | 42.9 % change on previous year | 14.29 % change on previous year | 141 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 90.35 % change on previous year | -35.92 % change on previous year | 272.92 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 19.87 % change on previous year | 11.88 % change on previous year | 27.87 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.11 % change on previous year | -47.81 % change on previous year | 47.36 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 15.38 % change on previous year | -1.23 % change on previous year | 38.75 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Zambia
- 175 Poland 0.3484 % change on previous year compare
- 176 Armenia 0.093 % change on previous year compare
- 177 Norway -0.162 % change on previous year compare
- 179 Malta -0.3559 % change on previous year compare
- 180 Brazil -0.5776 % change on previous year compare
- 181 Portugal -0.7203 % change on previous year compare
More environment data for Zambia
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -2.98 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -3.03 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.265 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.11 °C (2025)
- Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 0.0008 million SLC per person (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual -22.97 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit 0 million USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per 0 million USD per person (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Zambia?
- Value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Zambia was -0.2801 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Zambia?
- The highest recorded value was 272.92 % change on previous year in 1993.
- What is the lowest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Zambia?
- The lowest recorded value was -47.81 % change on previous year in 2018.
- How does Zambia rank for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
- Zambia ranks 178th out of 214 countries with data for 2024.
- Is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard rising or falling in Zambia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 96.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zambia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.