Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Ecuador
Ecuador: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard was 0.0006 million SLC per person in 2024. ▲ Rising
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Ecuador, 1970–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in million SLC per person.
Analysis
In 2024, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Ecuador stood at 0.0006 million SLC per person. That is the highest value across all 55 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 20.9% on the previous year and up 29.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Ecuador peaked at 0.0006 million SLC per person in 2024 and was at its lowest, 0.0001 million SLC per person, in 1971.
That places Ecuador 147th out of 180 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 55 years of available data.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | million SLC per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.0001 million SLC per person | — |
| 1971 | 0.0001 million SLC per person | -7.3% |
| 1972 | 0.0001 million SLC per person | +9.3% |
| 1973 | 0.0001 million SLC per person | +11.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | +52.4% |
| 1975 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | +5.7% |
| 1976 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | +3.4% |
| 1977 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | +13.4% |
| 1978 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | +4.1% |
| 1979 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | +4.9% |
| 1980 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | +21.9% |
| 1981 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | +15.8% |
| 1982 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | -7.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | -12.1% |
| 1984 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | +5.0% |
| 1985 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | +1.9% |
| 1986 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | -8.6% |
| 1987 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | -10.1% |
| 1988 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | -9.8% |
| 1989 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | +9.9% |
| 1990 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | +1.3% |
| 1991 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | +13.3% |
| 1992 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | -5.1% |
| 1993 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | +33.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0004 million SLC per person | +10.7% |
| 1995 | 0.0004 million SLC per person | +5.7% |
| 1996 | 0.0004 million SLC per person | -6.5% |
| 1997 | 0.0004 million SLC per person | +5.8% |
| 1998 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | -14.7% |
| 1999 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | -33.7% |
| 2000 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | -22.2% |
| 2001 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | +9.5% |
| 2002 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | +3.6% |
| 2003 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | +7.9% |
| 2004 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | -1.7% |
| 2005 | 0.0002 million SLC per person | +9.1% |
| 2006 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | +11.4% |
| 2007 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | +6.3% |
| 2008 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | +15.9% |
| 2009 | 0.0003 million SLC per person | +13.2% |
| 2010 | 0.0004 million SLC per person | +7.9% |
| 2011 | 0.0004 million SLC per person | +8.2% |
| 2012 | 0.0004 million SLC per person | -3.2% |
| 2013 | 0.0004 million SLC per person | +7.9% |
| 2014 | 0.0005 million SLC per person | +11.5% |
| 2015 | 0.0005 million SLC per person | +1.1% |
| 2016 | 0.0005 million SLC per person | -0.3% |
| 2017 | 0.0005 million SLC per person | +3.1% |
| 2018 | 0.0005 million SLC per person | -2.2% |
| 2019 | 0.0005 million SLC per person | +0.3% |
| 2020 | 0.0005 million SLC per person | -5.2% |
| 2021 | 0.0005 million SLC per person | +6.1% |
| 2022 | 0.0005 million SLC per person | -3.4% |
| 2023 | 0.0005 million SLC per person | +8.1% |
| 2024 | 0.0006 million SLC per person | +20.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0002 million SLC per person | 0.0001 million SLC per person | 0.0002 million SLC per person | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0003 million SLC per person | 0.0002 million SLC per person | 0.0003 million SLC per person | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0003 million SLC per person | 0.0002 million SLC per person | 0.0004 million SLC per person | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0002 million SLC per person | 0.0002 million SLC per person | 0.0003 million SLC per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0004 million SLC per person | 0.0004 million SLC per person | 0.0005 million SLC per person | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0005 million SLC per person | 0.0005 million SLC per person | 0.0006 million SLC per person | 5 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 144 Bulgaria 0.0007 million SLC per person compare
- 145 Austria 0.0006 million SLC per person compare
- 146 Montenegro 0.0006 million SLC per person compare
- 148 France 0.0006 million SLC per person compare
- 149 Cuba 0.0006 million SLC per person compare
- 150 Switzerland 0.0006 million SLC per person compare
More environment data for Ecuador
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly 0.3767 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -1.05 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.4 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.49 °C (2025)
- Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, annual growth rate 11.56 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 21.97 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual 21.97 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit 0 million USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per 0.0006 million USD per person (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Ecuador?
- Value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Ecuador was 0.0006 million SLC per person in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0006 million SLC per person in 2024.
- What is the lowest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0001 million SLC per person in 1971.
- How does Ecuador rank for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
- Ecuador ranks 147th out of 180 countries with data for 2024.
- Is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 29.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.