Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Australia
Australia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2024. ▼ Falling
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Australia, 1970–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in million SLC per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2024, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Australia stood at 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP.
The figure is down 11.4% on the previous year and up 15.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Australia peaked at 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2001 and was at its lowest, 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP, in 2013.
That places Australia 143rd out of 179 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 55 years of available data.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in Australia, year by year
| Year | million SLC per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1971 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +3.7% |
| 1972 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +18.4% |
| 1973 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +11.1% |
| 1974 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -37.2% |
| 1975 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -6.1% |
| 1976 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +3.2% |
| 1977 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 1978 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +48.9% |
| 1979 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +1.3% |
| 1980 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -13.8% |
| 1981 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -10.8% |
| 1982 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -28.0% |
| 1983 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +70.6% |
| 1984 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 1985 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +5.9% |
| 1986 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +6.9% |
| 1987 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +15.7% |
| 1988 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 1989 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -20.1% |
| 1990 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -25.3% |
| 1991 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -6.6% |
| 1992 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +12.3% |
| 1993 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +12.4% |
| 1994 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -7.4% |
| 1995 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +5.0% |
| 1996 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 1997 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 1998 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +15.7% |
| 1999 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +11.6% |
| 2000 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +12.4% |
| 2001 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +32.2% |
| 2002 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -25.4% |
| 2003 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -3.5% |
| 2004 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -23.2% |
| 2005 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -9.7% |
| 2006 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -18.2% |
| 2007 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +0.7% |
| 2008 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -15.0% |
| 2009 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +12.5% |
| 2010 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 2011 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -14.0% |
| 2012 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -6.7% |
| 2013 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -0.9% |
| 2014 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +16.7% |
| 2015 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +12.3% |
| 2016 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +33.6% |
| 2017 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -13.3% |
| 2018 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -15.6% |
| 2019 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -0.8% |
| 2020 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +26.4% |
| 2021 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +10.8% |
| 2022 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -2.4% |
| 2023 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -12.3% |
| 2024 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -11.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Australia
- 140 Croatia 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
- 141 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
- 142 Greece 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
- 144 Saint Lucia 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Cuba 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
- 146 Palau 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP compare
More environment data for Australia
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly -4.75 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly -5.98 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.345 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.4 °C (2025)
- Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard -10.28 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 0.002 million SLC per person (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual -10.88 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit 0 million USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Australia?
- Value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in Australia was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Australia?
- The highest recorded value was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2001.
- What is the lowest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in Australia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2013.
- How does Australia rank for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
- Australia ranks 143rd out of 179 countries with data for 2024.
- Is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard rising or falling in Australia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 15.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Australia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.