Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in South Africa
South Africa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in South Africa, 1970–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in million SLC per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
South Africa recorded 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in 2024. That is the highest value across all 55 years on record.
The figure is up 10.9% on the previous year and up 122.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in South Africa peaked at 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2024 and was at its lowest, 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP, in 1983.
South Africa ranks 93rd of 179 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard in South Africa, year by year
| Year | million SLC per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1971 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +8.7% |
| 1972 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +6.0% |
| 1973 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -13.1% |
| 1974 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +18.6% |
| 1975 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -4.0% |
| 1976 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +3.4% |
| 1977 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +4.7% |
| 1978 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 1979 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -13.2% |
| 1980 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -1.9% |
| 1981 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +15.4% |
| 1982 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +7.1% |
| 1983 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -20.3% |
| 1984 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +43.5% |
| 1985 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +63.6% |
| 1986 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 1987 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +15.1% |
| 1989 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +6.4% |
| 1990 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -15.3% |
| 1991 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +8.1% |
| 1992 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -13.5% |
| 1993 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +21.2% |
| 1994 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +19.2% |
| 1995 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -15.1% |
| 1996 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +29.7% |
| 1997 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +2.5% |
| 1998 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +11.5% |
| 1999 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +3.7% |
| 2000 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +4.3% |
| 2001 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +33.4% |
| 2002 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +28.7% |
| 2003 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -35.6% |
| 2004 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -22.4% |
| 2005 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -14.9% |
| 2006 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +4.7% |
| 2007 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +19.5% |
| 2008 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +28.0% |
| 2009 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 2010 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -24.1% |
| 2011 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -3.8% |
| 2012 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +9.3% |
| 2013 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +14.6% |
| 2014 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +24.0% |
| 2015 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +23.6% |
| 2016 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +24.7% |
| 2017 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -6.5% |
| 2018 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -9.9% |
| 2019 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 2020 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +51.0% |
| 2021 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | -11.1% |
| 2022 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +21.7% |
| 2023 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +0.3% |
| 2024 | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | +10.9% |
South Africa compared with similar countries
- South Africa's 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP, 1.0× the median. (51 countries reporting)
- South Africa's 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP, 1% of the median. (44 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near South Africa
More environment data for South Africa
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly 5.46 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly 8.52 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.275 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.05 °C (2025)
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Export quantity, gaps filled 172,469 t (2024)
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled 640,129 t (2024)
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate 10.74 % change on previous year (2024)
- Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled 187,679 t (2024)
- Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, annual growth rate 35.24 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in South Africa?
- Value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard in South Africa was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in South Africa?
- The highest recorded value was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 2024.
- What is the lowest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard recorded in South Africa?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in 1983.
- How does South Africa rank for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
- South Africa ranks 93rd out of 179 countries with data for 2024.
- Is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard rising or falling in South Africa?
- Over the last ten years it is up 122.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this South Africa data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.