Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual in Eswatini
Eswatini: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual was 8.44 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual in Eswatini, 1971–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual in Eswatini is 8.44 % change on previous year, measured in 2024.
The figure is up 204.3% on the previous year and up 169.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual in Eswatini peaked at 52 % change on previous year in 2003 and was at its lowest, -34.39 % change on previous year, in 1985.
Eswatini ranks 59th of 218 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | 16.52 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | 8.55 % change on previous year | -48.2% |
| 1973 | 29.24 % change on previous year | +242.0% |
| 1974 | 19.16 % change on previous year | -34.5% |
| 1975 | 7.2 % change on previous year | -62.4% |
| 1976 | -0.7777 % change on previous year | -110.8% |
| 1977 | 16.67 % change on previous year | -2243.9% |
| 1978 | 16.67 % change on previous year | -0.0% |
| 1979 | 20.49 % change on previous year | +22.9% |
| 1980 | 26.14 % change on previous year | +27.6% |
| 1981 | 14.73 % change on previous year | -43.7% |
| 1982 | -13.8 % change on previous year | -193.7% |
| 1983 | 11.02 % change on previous year | -179.9% |
| 1984 | -33.36 % change on previous year | -402.7% |
| 1985 | -34.39 % change on previous year | +3.1% |
| 1986 | 19.95 % change on previous year | -158.0% |
| 1987 | 5.85 % change on previous year | -70.7% |
| 1988 | 24.25 % change on previous year | +314.4% |
| 1989 | 6.43 % change on previous year | -73.5% |
| 1990 | -20.97 % change on previous year | -426.2% |
| 1991 | 36.03 % change on previous year | -271.8% |
| 1992 | -11.02 % change on previous year | -130.6% |
| 1993 | -26.9 % change on previous year | +144.2% |
| 1994 | 41.39 % change on previous year | -253.9% |
| 1995 | 13.46 % change on previous year | -67.5% |
| 1996 | 8.76 % change on previous year | -34.9% |
| 1997 | 3.12 % change on previous year | -64.4% |
| 1998 | -8.24 % change on previous year | -364.1% |
| 1999 | 2.17 % change on previous year | -126.3% |
| 2000 | 38.69 % change on previous year | +1685.8% |
| 2001 | -12.82 % change on previous year | -133.1% |
| 2002 | -4.05 % change on previous year | -68.4% |
| 2003 | 52 % change on previous year | -1383.3% |
| 2004 | -1.69 % change on previous year | -103.3% |
| 2005 | 30.32 % change on previous year | -1891.6% |
| 2006 | 5.57 % change on previous year | -81.6% |
| 2007 | 1.36 % change on previous year | -75.6% |
| 2008 | -11.72 % change on previous year | -963.6% |
| 2009 | 0.5504 % change on previous year | -104.7% |
| 2010 | 36.11 % change on previous year | +6461.1% |
| 2011 | 3.93 % change on previous year | -89.1% |
| 2012 | 6.41 % change on previous year | +63.0% |
| 2013 | -6.72 % change on previous year | -204.8% |
| 2014 | -12.18 % change on previous year | +81.2% |
| 2015 | -7.03 % change on previous year | -42.3% |
| 2016 | -9.96 % change on previous year | +41.6% |
| 2017 | 8.57 % change on previous year | -186.1% |
| 2018 | 7.24 % change on previous year | -15.5% |
| 2019 | -3.55 % change on previous year | -149.0% |
| 2020 | -15.81 % change on previous year | +345.8% |
| 2021 | 21.54 % change on previous year | -236.3% |
| 2022 | 4.69 % change on previous year | -78.2% |
| 2023 | -8.09 % change on previous year | -272.5% |
| 2024 | 8.44 % change on previous year | -204.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 14.86 % change on previous year | -0.7777 % change on previous year | 29.24 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1980s | 2.68 % change on previous year | -34.39 % change on previous year | 26.14 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.78 % change on previous year | -26.9 % change on previous year | 41.39 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 9.82 % change on previous year | -12.82 % change on previous year | 52 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.28 % change on previous year | -12.18 % change on previous year | 36.11 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.15 % change on previous year | -15.81 % change on previous year | 21.54 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
- 56 Finland 8.62 % change on previous year compare
- 57 USSR 8.51 % change on previous year compare
- 58 Marshall Islands 8.45 % change on previous year compare
- 60 Mozambique 8.42 % change on previous year compare
- 61 Cayman Islands 8.38 % change on previous year compare
- 62 Djibouti 8.23 % change on previous year compare
More environment data for Eswatini
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.321 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.02 °C (2025)
- Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 7.62 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 0.006 million SLC per person (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit 0 million USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per 0.0003 million USD per person (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 2.41 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 0.0038 million SLC per person (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual in Eswatini?
- Value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual in Eswatini was 8.44 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 52 % change on previous year in 2003.
- What is the lowest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was -34.39 % change on previous year in 1985.
- How does Eswatini rank for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual?
- Eswatini ranks 59th out of 218 countries with data for 2024.
- Is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is up 169.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.