Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual was -34.13 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual in Zimbabwe, 1971–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual in Zimbabwe is -34.13 % change on previous year, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 202.9% on the previous year and down 3,553.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual in Zimbabwe peaked at 97.66 % change on previous year in 1993 and was at its lowest, -58.9 % change on previous year, in 1992.
Zimbabwe ranks 214th of 218 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | 31.1 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | 26.67 % change on previous year | -14.3% |
| 1973 | 3.26 % change on previous year | -87.8% |
| 1974 | 47.12 % change on previous year | +1345.6% |
| 1975 | 4.84 % change on previous year | -89.7% |
| 1976 | -1.21 % change on previous year | -125.1% |
| 1977 | -5.02 % change on previous year | +313.8% |
| 1978 | -19.34 % change on previous year | +284.9% |
| 1979 | 10.15 % change on previous year | -152.5% |
| 1980 | 48.16 % change on previous year | +374.7% |
| 1981 | 32.52 % change on previous year | -32.5% |
| 1982 | -4.96 % change on previous year | -115.2% |
| 1983 | -39.07 % change on previous year | +688.4% |
| 1984 | 10.77 % change on previous year | -127.6% |
| 1985 | 96.38 % change on previous year | +794.6% |
| 1986 | -14.12 % change on previous year | -114.6% |
| 1987 | -11.82 % change on previous year | -16.3% |
| 1988 | 30.95 % change on previous year | -362.0% |
| 1989 | -4.44 % change on previous year | -114.3% |
| 1990 | 17.45 % change on previous year | -493.2% |
| 1991 | -14.78 % change on previous year | -184.7% |
| 1992 | -58.9 % change on previous year | +298.6% |
| 1993 | 97.66 % change on previous year | -265.8% |
| 1994 | 30.72 % change on previous year | -68.5% |
| 1995 | -18.62 % change on previous year | -160.6% |
| 1996 | 85.09 % change on previous year | -557.0% |
| 1997 | 3.55 % change on previous year | -95.8% |
| 1998 | -35.13 % change on previous year | -1090.7% |
| 1999 | 18.88 % change on previous year | -153.7% |
| 2000 | -5.67 % change on previous year | -130.0% |
| 2001 | 25.84 % change on previous year | -555.7% |
| 2002 | -3.93 % change on previous year | -115.2% |
| 2003 | -25.49 % change on previous year | +549.0% |
| 2004 | -54.18 % change on previous year | +112.5% |
| 2005 | -1.73 % change on previous year | -96.8% |
| 2006 | 62.94 % change on previous year | -3737.6% |
| 2007 | 39.82 % change on previous year | -36.7% |
| 2008 | -28.29 % change on previous year | -171.0% |
| 2009 | -7.08 % change on previous year | -75.0% |
| 2010 | 11.45 % change on previous year | -261.6% |
| 2011 | 5.6 % change on previous year | -51.0% |
| 2012 | 12.66 % change on previous year | +125.9% |
| 2013 | -0.934 % change on previous year | -107.4% |
| 2014 | 25 % change on previous year | -2776.6% |
| 2015 | -3 % change on previous year | -112.0% |
| 2016 | -2.16 % change on previous year | -27.9% |
| 2017 | -1.27 % change on previous year | -41.3% |
| 2018 | 8.34 % change on previous year | -756.7% |
| 2019 | 28.19 % change on previous year | +238.0% |
| 2020 | -14.33 % change on previous year | -150.8% |
| 2021 | 12.3 % change on previous year | -185.8% |
| 2022 | -11.27 % change on previous year | -191.6% |
| 2023 | -34.13 % change on previous year | +202.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 10.84 % change on previous year | -19.34 % change on previous year | 47.12 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1980s | 14.44 % change on previous year | -39.07 % change on previous year | 96.38 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 12.59 % change on previous year | -58.9 % change on previous year | 97.66 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.2232 % change on previous year | -54.18 % change on previous year | 62.94 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 8.39 % change on previous year | -3 % change on previous year | 28.19 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -11.86 % change on previous year | -34.13 % change on previous year | 12.3 % change on previous year | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 211 Yemen -16.47 % change on previous year compare
- 212 Zambia -22.97 % change on previous year compare
- 213 Fiji -23.52 % change on previous year compare
- 215 Syrian Arab Republic -36.81 % change on previous year compare
- 216 Maldives -36.83 % change on previous year compare
- 217 Myanmar -40.53 % change on previous year compare
More environment data for Zimbabwe
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly 2.93 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly 3.29 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.311 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.06 °C (2025)
- Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard -34.13 % change on previous year (2023)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 0.0012 million SLC per person (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit 0 million USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per 0.0012 million USD per person (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual in Zimbabwe?
- Value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual in Zimbabwe was -34.13 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 97.66 % change on previous year in 1993.
- What is the lowest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was -58.9 % change on previous year in 1992.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual?
- Zimbabwe ranks 214th out of 218 countries with data for 2023.
- Is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 3,553.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.