Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit in South Africa
South Africa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit was 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in 2024. ▼ Falling
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit in South Africa, 1970–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in million USD per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit in South Africa is 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of up 11.6% on the previous year and up 31.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit in South Africa peaked at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in 1974 and was at its lowest, 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, in 2013.
That places South Africa 119th out of 179 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 55 years of available data.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit in South Africa, year by year
| Year | million USD per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1971 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +8.6% |
| 1972 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 1973 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -3.8% |
| 1974 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +21.1% |
| 1975 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 1976 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -12.1% |
| 1977 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +4.7% |
| 1978 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 1979 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -10.4% |
| 1980 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +6.1% |
| 1981 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +2.4% |
| 1982 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -13.4% |
| 1983 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -22.3% |
| 1984 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +8.3% |
| 1985 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +8.3% |
| 1986 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -3.9% |
| 1987 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +12.3% |
| 1988 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +3.1% |
| 1989 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 1990 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -14.1% |
| 1991 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +1.3% |
| 1992 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -16.3% |
| 1993 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +5.8% |
| 1994 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +9.7% |
| 1995 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -16.9% |
| 1996 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +9.5% |
| 1997 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 1998 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -7.1% |
| 1999 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 2000 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -8.1% |
| 2001 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +7.6% |
| 2002 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +5.1% |
| 2003 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -10.2% |
| 2004 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 2005 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -13.5% |
| 2006 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -1.6% |
| 2007 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +14.9% |
| 2008 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +9.2% |
| 2009 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -6.7% |
| 2010 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -12.2% |
| 2011 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 2012 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -3.3% |
| 2013 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -2.6% |
| 2014 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +10.3% |
| 2015 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +5.1% |
| 2016 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +8.1% |
| 2017 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +3.2% |
| 2018 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -9.3% |
| 2019 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -13.7% |
| 2020 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +32.5% |
| 2021 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -1.0% |
| 2022 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +10.0% |
| 2023 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | -11.1% |
| 2024 | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | +11.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | 0 million USD per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near South Africa
- 116 Maldives 0 million USD per US$ of GDP compare
- 117 Grenada 0 million USD per US$ of GDP compare
- 118 Iraq 0 million USD per US$ of GDP compare
- 120 Equatorial Guinea 0 million USD per US$ of GDP compare
- 121 Cuba 0 million USD per US$ of GDP compare
- 122 French Polynesia 0 million USD per US$ of GDP compare
More environment data for South Africa
- Historical exposure to drought — Land soil moisture anomaly 5.46 Percentage change (2025)
- Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly 8.52 Percentage change (2025)
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.275 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 1.05 °C (2025)
- Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 16.61 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard 0.0032 million SLC per person (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual 17.38 % change on previous year (2024)
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per 0.0002 million USD per person (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit in South Africa?
- Value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit in South Africa was 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit recorded in South Africa?
- The highest recorded value was 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in 1974.
- What is the lowest value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit recorded in South Africa?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in 2013.
- How does South Africa rank for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit?
- South Africa ranks 119th out of 179 countries with data for 2024.
- Is value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit rising or falling in South Africa?
- Over the last ten years it is up 31.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this South Africa data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.