Wood fuel — Production, per unit of GDP in Lithuania
Lithuania: Wood fuel — Production, per unit of GDP was 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Wood fuel — Production, per unit of GDP in Lithuania, 1995–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in m3 per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for wood fuel — production, per unit of gdp in Lithuania is 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.
The figure is down 10.1% on the previous year and down 48.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, wood fuel — production, per unit of gdp in Lithuania peaked at 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, in 2022.
Lithuania ranks 89th of 167 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Wood fuel — Production, per unit of GDP in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | m3 per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1996 | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | +6.0% |
| 1997 | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | -22.6% |
| 1998 | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | -8.3% |
| 1999 | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | -1.6% |
| 2000 | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | +23.1% |
| 2001 | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | -3.8% |
| 2002 | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | -24.9% |
| 2003 | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | -22.6% |
| 2004 | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | -21.1% |
| 2005 | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | -21.9% |
| 2006 | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | -5.6% |
| 2007 | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | -19.6% |
| 2008 | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | -12.1% |
| 2009 | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | +64.6% |
| 2010 | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | +11.5% |
| 2011 | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | -27.6% |
| 2012 | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | +34.2% |
| 2013 | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | +1.9% |
| 2014 | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 2015 | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | +5.9% |
| 2016 | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | -4.5% |
| 2017 | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | -13.0% |
| 2018 | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | -20.1% |
| 2019 | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | -4.7% |
| 2020 | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | +8.1% |
| 2021 | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | -19.1% |
| 2022 | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | -28.4% |
| 2023 | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | +37.4% |
| 2024 | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | -10.1% |
Lithuania compared with similar countries
- Lithuania's 0 m3 per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, 11.5× the median. (57 countries reporting)
- Lithuania's 0 m3 per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 m3 per US$ of GDP, 3.1× the median. (46 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 5 |
| 2000s | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 0 m3 per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
- 86 North Macedonia 0 m3 per US$ of GDP compare
- 87 Uruguay 0 m3 per US$ of GDP compare
- 88 Yemen 0 m3 per US$ of GDP compare
- 90 Philippines 0 m3 per US$ of GDP compare
- 91 Peru 0 m3 per US$ of GDP compare
- 92 Montenegro 0 m3 per US$ of GDP compare
More environment data for Lithuania
- Standard Deviation, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Standard Deviation 0.889 °C (2025)
- Temperature change 2.41 °C (2025)
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual -2.36 % change on previous year (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e) 2.32 % change on previous year (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per 0 Mt CO2e per person (2024)
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), annual -4 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is wood fuel — production, per unit of gdp in Lithuania?
- Wood fuel — production, per unit of gdp in Lithuania was 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest wood fuel — production, per unit of gdp recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0001 m3 per US$ of GDP in 1996.
- What is the lowest wood fuel — production, per unit of gdp recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 m3 per US$ of GDP in 2022.
- How does Lithuania rank for wood fuel — production, per unit of gdp?
- Lithuania ranks 89th out of 167 countries with data for 2024.
- Is wood fuel — production, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 48.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Wood fuel — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 30 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Wood fuel — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Wood fuel — Production ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Wood fuel — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Wood fuel — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.