Ethiopia vs Small Island Developing States (SIDS): 15.1.1 Forest area — Value
15.1.1 Forest area — Value over time
- Ethiopia
- Small Island Developing States (SIDS)
How they compare
Small Island Developing States (SIDS) currently reports 86,144 1000 ha against 26,747 1000 ha in Ethiopia, a difference of 59,397 1000 ha.
That makes Small Island Developing States (SIDS)'s figure about 3.2 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Small Island Developing States (SIDS) has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 24th and Small Island Developing States (SIDS) ranks 24th of 236 countries.
Small Island Developing States (SIDS) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Small Island Developing States (SIDS) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 28,538 1000 ha | 85,688 1000 ha | 57,150 1000 ha | Small Island Developing States (SIDS) |
| 2000s | 27,809 1000 ha | 85,928 1000 ha | 58,118 1000 ha | Small Island Developing States (SIDS) |
| 2010s | 26,934 1000 ha | 86,244 1000 ha | 59,310 1000 ha | Small Island Developing States (SIDS) |
| 2020s | 26,757 1000 ha | 86,180 1000 ha | 59,423 1000 ha | Small Island Developing States (SIDS) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 15.1.1 forest area — value, Ethiopia or Small Island Developing States (SIDS)?
- Small Island Developing States (SIDS), at 86,144 1000 ha against 26,747 1000 ha in Ethiopia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 15.1.1 forest area — value between Ethiopia and Small Island Developing States (SIDS)?
- 59,397 1000 ha, with Small Island Developing States (SIDS) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Small Island Developing States (SIDS)?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Ethiopia and Small Island Developing States (SIDS) rank globally for 15.1.1 forest area — value?
- Ethiopia ranks 24th and Small Island Developing States (SIDS) ranks 24th of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 15.1.1 Forest area — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.