Grenada vs United States Virgin Islands: 15.1.1 Forest area β€” Value

Grenada
17.7 1000 ha
in 2025
United States Virgin Islands
20.66 1000 ha
in 2025
Grenada rank
186th
United States Virgin Islands rank
183rd

15.1.1 Forest area β€” Value over time

  • Grenada
  • United States Virgin Islands
05101520199020072025

How they compare

United States Virgin Islands currently reports 20.66 1000 ha against 17.7 1000 ha in Grenada, a difference of 2.96 1000 ha.

That makes United States Virgin Islands's figure about 1.2 times Grenada's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, United States Virgin Islands has been ahead every year.

Grenada ranks 186th and United States Virgin Islands ranks 183rd of 236 countries.

United States Virgin Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada United States Virgin Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 17.7 1000 ha 20.41 1000 ha 2.71 1000 ha United States Virgin Islands
2000s 17.7 1000 ha 19.29 1000 ha 1.59 1000 ha United States Virgin Islands
2010s 17.7 1000 ha 18.8 1000 ha 1.1 1000 ha United States Virgin Islands
2020s 17.7 1000 ha 20.29 1000 ha 2.59 1000 ha United States Virgin Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 15.1.1 forest area β€” value, Grenada or United States Virgin Islands?
United States Virgin Islands, at 20.66 1000 ha against 17.7 1000 ha in Grenada as of 2025.
What is the difference in 15.1.1 forest area β€” value between Grenada and United States Virgin Islands?
2.96 1000 ha, with United States Virgin Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and United States Virgin Islands?
6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Grenada and United States Virgin Islands rank globally for 15.1.1 forest area β€” value?
Grenada ranks 186th and United States Virgin Islands ranks 183rd of 236 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 15.1.1 Forest area β€” Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
15.1.1 Forest area β€” Value
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 1,644 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: β€’ Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.β€’ Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.β€’ Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.β€’ Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.β€’ Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.β€’ Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.