Chile vs Lesotho: 15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Total; Land Cover: Tree-covered

Chile
19.89 %
in 2021
Lesotho
15.46 %
in 2021
Chile rank
123rd
Lesotho rank
126th

15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Total; Land Cover: Tree-covered over time

  • Chile
  • Lesotho
05101520200020102021

How they compare

Chile currently reports 19.89 % against 15.46 % in Lesotho, a difference of 4.43 %.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Lesotho's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 123rd and Lesotho ranks 126th of 170 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Lesotho Difference Ahead
2000s 19.95 % 15.41 % 4.54 % Chile
2010s 19.91 % 15.43 % 4.48 % Chile
2020s 19.89 % 15.46 % 4.43 % Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: total; land cover: tree-covered, Chile or Lesotho?
Chile, at 19.89 % against 15.46 % in Lesotho as of 2021.
What is the difference in 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: total; land cover: tree-covered between Chile and Lesotho?
4.43 %, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Lesotho?
6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Chile and Lesotho rank globally for 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: total; land cover: tree-covered?
Chile ranks 123rd and Lesotho ranks 126th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Total; Land Cover: Tree-covered areas — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Lesotho: 15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Total; Land Cover: Tree-covered. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/15-4-2a-mountain-green-cover-index-total-land-cover-tree-covered-areas-value/chile/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/15-4-2a-mountain-green-cover-index-total-land-cover-tree-covered-areas-value/chile/lesotho/">Chile vs Lesotho: 15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Total; Land Cover: Tree-covered</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Total; Land Cover: Tree-covered areas — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
206 places, 1,236 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.