China, Hong Kong SAR vs Myanmar: 15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Total; Land Cover: Tree-covered
15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Total; Land Cover: Tree-covered over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Myanmar
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 90.2 % against 87.34 % in Myanmar, a difference of 2.86 %.
Across all 6 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 23rd and Myanmar ranks 26th of 170 countries.
China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.82 % | 89.37 % | 1.45 % | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2010s | 90.42 % | 88.17 % | 2.25 % | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2020s | 90.2 % | 87.34 % | 2.86 % | China, Hong Kong SAR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: total; land cover: tree-covered, China, Hong Kong SAR or Myanmar?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 90.2 % against 87.34 % in Myanmar as of 2021.
- What is the difference in 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: total; land cover: tree-covered between China, Hong Kong SAR and Myanmar?
- 2.86 %, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Myanmar?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Myanmar rank globally for 15.4.2a mountain green cover index: total; land cover: tree-covered?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 23rd and Myanmar ranks 26th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 15.4.2a Mountain Green Cover Index: Total; Land Cover: Tree-covered areas — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.