How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Jordan?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO), published as Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural (% of rural population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Jordan: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural

Belarus

99.4%

in 2023

Jordan

99.1%

in 2023

Belarus rank

66th

Jordan rank

68th

Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural over time

Belarus
Jordan

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 99.4% against 99.1% in Jordan, a difference of 0.3%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jordan ahead.

Belarus ranks 66th and Jordan ranks 68th of 189 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Jordan	Difference	Ahead
2000s	90.4%	99.3%	8.9%	Jordan
2010s	97.9%	99.5%	1.5%	Jordan
2020s	99.3%	99.2%	0.1%	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural, Belarus or Jordan?: Belarus, at 99.4% against 99.1% in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural between Belarus and Jordan?: 0.3%, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Jordan?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Jordan rank globally for access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural?: Belarus ranks 66th and Jordan ranks 68th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO), published as Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural (% of rural population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Jordan: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural. Statizoid, drawing on Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/access-to-clean-fuels-and-technologies-for-cooking-rural-percent-of-rural-population/belarus/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/access-to-clean-fuels-and-technologies-for-cooking-rural-percent-of-rural-population/belarus/jordan/">Belarus vs Jordan: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural (% of rural population)
Unit: % of rural population
Source: Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 236 places, 5,664 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural is the proportion of rural population primarily using clean cooking fuels and technologies for cooking. Under WHO guidelines, kerosene is excluded from clean cooking fuels.