Australia vs Central Africa (African Union): Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Australia
30,644 Hectares
in 2020
Central Africa (African Union)
28,895 Hectares
in 2020
Australia rank
12th
Central Africa (African Union) rank
14th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Australia
  • Central Africa (African Union)
010.0k20.0k30.0k200020102020

How they compare

Australia currently reports 30,644 Hectares against 28,895 Hectares in Central Africa (African Union), a difference of 1,749 Hectares.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Central Africa (African Union)'s.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 12th and Central Africa (African Union) ranks 14th of 167 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Central Africa (African Union) Difference Ahead
2000s 24,528 Hectares 20,464 Hectares 4,064 Hectares Australia
2010s 30,555 Hectares 27,142 Hectares 3,413 Hectares Australia
2020s 30,644 Hectares 28,895 Hectares 1,749 Hectares Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Australia or Central Africa (African Union)?
Australia, at 30,644 Hectares against 28,895 Hectares in Central Africa (African Union) as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Australia and Central Africa (African Union)?
1,749 Hectares, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Central Africa (African Union)?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Australia and Central Africa (African Union) rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Australia ranks 12th and Central Africa (African Union) ranks 14th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Central Africa (African Union): Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/australia/central-africa-african-union/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/australia/central-africa-african-union/">Australia vs Central Africa (African Union): Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
242 places, 5,064 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.