Austria vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Austria
1,321 Hectares
in 2020
Lao People's Democratic Republic
1,224 Hectares
in 2020
Austria rank
90th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
92nd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Austria
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
05001.0k1.5k200020102020

How they compare

Austria currently reports 1,321 Hectares against 1,224 Hectares in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 97 Hectares.

That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 90th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 92nd of 172 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Lao People's Democratic Republic in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 1,380 Hectares 1,131 Hectares 248.98 Hectares Austria
2010s 1,346 Hectares 1,441 Hectares 95.51 Hectares Lao People's Democratic Republic
2020s 1,321 Hectares 1,224 Hectares 97.08 Hectares Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Austria or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Austria, at 1,321 Hectares against 1,224 Hectares in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Austria and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
97 Hectares, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Austria and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Austria ranks 90th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 92nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/austria/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/austria/lao-pdr/">Austria vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
242 places, 5,064 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. <br><br> Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.