Azerbaijan vs Central African Republic: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Azerbaijan
2,084 Hectares
in 2020
Central African Republic
1,800 Hectares
in 2020
Azerbaijan rank
76th
Central African Republic rank
79th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Central African Republic
05001.0k1.5k2.0k200020102020

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 2,084 Hectares against 1,800 Hectares in Central African Republic, a difference of 284 Hectares.

That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.2 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 76th and Central African Republic ranks 79th of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and Central African Republic in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Central African Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 1,845 Hectares 1,918 Hectares 73.35 Hectares Central African Republic
2010s 1,974 Hectares 1,803 Hectares 170.95 Hectares Azerbaijan
2020s 2,084 Hectares 1,800 Hectares 284.3 Hectares Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Azerbaijan or Central African Republic?
Azerbaijan, at 2,084 Hectares against 1,800 Hectares in Central African Republic as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Azerbaijan and Central African Republic?
284 Hectares, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Central African Republic?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Azerbaijan and Central African Republic rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Azerbaijan ranks 76th and Central African Republic ranks 79th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Central African Republic: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/azerbaijan/central-african-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/azerbaijan/central-african-republic/">Azerbaijan vs Central African Republic: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
242 places, 5,064 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.