Bangladesh vs East African Community: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Bangladesh
8,000 Hectares
in 2020
East African Community
44,426 Hectares
in 2020
Bangladesh rank
27th
East African Community rank
27th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Bangladesh
  • East African Community
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k200020102020

How they compare

East African Community currently reports 44,426 Hectares against 8,000 Hectares in Bangladesh, a difference of 36,426 Hectares.

That makes East African Community's figure about 5.6 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, East African Community has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 27th and East African Community ranks 27th of 167 countries.

East African Community has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh East African Community Difference Ahead
2000s 8,048 Hectares 29,714 Hectares 21,665 Hectares East African Community
2010s 7,748 Hectares 41,528 Hectares 33,780 Hectares East African Community
2020s 8,000 Hectares 44,426 Hectares 36,426 Hectares East African Community

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Bangladesh or East African Community?
East African Community, at 44,426 Hectares against 8,000 Hectares in Bangladesh as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Bangladesh and East African Community?
36,426 Hectares, with East African Community ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and East African Community?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Bangladesh and East African Community rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Bangladesh ranks 27th and East African Community ranks 27th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs East African Community: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/bangladesh/east-african-community/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/bangladesh/east-african-community/">Bangladesh vs East African Community: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
242 places, 5,064 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.