Belarus, Republic of vs Mozambique, Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Belarus, Republic of
5,660 Hectares
in 2020
Mozambique, Republic of
5,650 Hectares
in 2020
Belarus, Republic of rank
43rd
Mozambique, Republic of rank
44th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Belarus, Republic of
  • Mozambique, Republic of
02.0k4.0k6.0k200020102020

How they compare

Belarus, Republic of currently reports 5,660 Hectares against 5,650 Hectares in Mozambique, Republic of, a difference of 10 Hectares.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belarus, Republic of ahead.

Belarus, Republic of ranks 43rd and Mozambique, Republic of ranks 44th of 172 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus, Republic of averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique, Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus, Republic of Mozambique, Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 5,629 Hectares 4,745 Hectares 883.8 Hectares Belarus, Republic of
2010s 5,632 Hectares 5,650 Hectares 17.9 Hectares Mozambique, Republic of
2020s 5,660 Hectares 5,650 Hectares 10 Hectares Belarus, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Belarus, Republic of or Mozambique, Republic of?
Belarus, Republic of, at 5,660 Hectares against 5,650 Hectares in Mozambique, Republic of as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Belarus, Republic of and Mozambique, Republic of?
10 Hectares, with Belarus, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus, Republic of and Mozambique, Republic of?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Belarus, Republic of and Mozambique, Republic of rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Belarus, Republic of ranks 43rd and Mozambique, Republic of ranks 44th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus, Republic of vs Mozambique, Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/belarus/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/belarus/mozambique/">Belarus, Republic of vs Mozambique, Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
242 places, 5,064 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. <br><br> Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.