Belarus vs United Kingdom: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Belarus
5,660 Hectares
in 2020
United Kingdom
5,978 Hectares
in 2020
Belarus rank
38th
United Kingdom rank
36th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Belarus
  • United Kingdom
02.0k4.0k6.0k200020102020

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 5,978 Hectares against 5,660 Hectares in Belarus, a difference of 318 Hectares.

That makes United Kingdom's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 38th and United Kingdom ranks 36th of 167 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s 5,629 Hectares 5,875 Hectares 246.5 Hectares United Kingdom
2010s 5,632 Hectares 6,099 Hectares 466.52 Hectares United Kingdom
2020s 5,660 Hectares 5,978 Hectares 318.5 Hectares United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Belarus or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 5,978 Hectares against 5,660 Hectares in Belarus as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Belarus and United Kingdom?
318 Hectares, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and United Kingdom?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Belarus and United Kingdom rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Belarus ranks 38th and United Kingdom ranks 36th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs United Kingdom: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/belarus/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/belarus/united-kingdom/">Belarus vs United Kingdom: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
242 places, 5,064 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.