Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Uzbekistan: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Bolivia, Plurinational State of
4,540 Hectares
in 2020
Uzbekistan
4,023 Hectares
in 2020
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
46th
Uzbekistan rank
48th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Bolivia, Plurinational State of
  • Uzbekistan
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k200020102020

How they compare

Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 4,540 Hectares against 4,023 Hectares in Uzbekistan, a difference of 517 Hectares.

That makes Bolivia, Plurinational State of's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uzbekistan ahead.

Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 46th and Uzbekistan ranks 48th of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bolivia, Plurinational State of averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia, Plurinational State of Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2000s 3,729 Hectares 4,374 Hectares 645.2 Hectares Uzbekistan
2010s 4,415 Hectares 4,065 Hectares 349.3 Hectares Bolivia, Plurinational State of
2020s 4,540 Hectares 4,023 Hectares 517 Hectares Bolivia, Plurinational State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Uzbekistan?
Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 4,540 Hectares against 4,023 Hectares in Uzbekistan as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Uzbekistan?
517 Hectares, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Uzbekistan?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Uzbekistan rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 46th and Uzbekistan ranks 48th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Uzbekistan: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/bolivia/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/bolivia/uzbekistan/">Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Uzbekistan: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
242 places, 5,064 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.