Central Africa (African Union) vs Mexico: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Central Africa (African Union)
28,895 Hectares
in 2020
Mexico
20,071 Hectares
in 2020
Central Africa (African Union) rank
14th
Mexico rank
16th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Central Africa (African Union)
  • Mexico
010.0k20.0k30.0k200020102020

How they compare

Central Africa (African Union) currently reports 28,895 Hectares against 20,071 Hectares in Mexico, a difference of 8,824 Hectares.

That makes Central Africa (African Union)'s figure about 1.4 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mexico ahead.

Central Africa (African Union) ranks 14th and Mexico ranks 16th of 28 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Central Africa (African Union) averaged higher in 2 and Mexico in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Africa (African Union) Mexico Difference Ahead
2000s 20,464 Hectares 23,273 Hectares 2,809 Hectares Mexico
2010s 27,142 Hectares 21,621 Hectares 5,522 Hectares Central Africa (African Union)
2020s 28,895 Hectares 20,071 Hectares 8,824 Hectares Central Africa (African Union)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Central Africa (African Union) or Mexico?
Central Africa (African Union), at 28,895 Hectares against 20,071 Hectares in Mexico as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Central Africa (African Union) and Mexico?
8,824 Hectares, with Central Africa (African Union) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Africa (African Union) and Mexico?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Central Africa (African Union) and Mexico rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Central Africa (African Union) ranks 14th and Mexico ranks 16th of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Africa (African Union) vs Mexico: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/central-africa-african-union/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/central-africa-african-union/mexico/">Central Africa (African Union) vs Mexico: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
242 places, 5,064 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.