Chile vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Chile
1,197 Hectares
in 2020
Lao People's Democratic Republic
1,224 Hectares
in 2020
Chile rank
94th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
92nd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Chile
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
05001.0k1.5k2.0k200020102020

How they compare

Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 1,224 Hectares against 1,197 Hectares in Chile, a difference of 27 Hectares.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 94th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 92nd of 172 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Lao People's Democratic Republic in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 1,483 Hectares 1,131 Hectares 352.4 Hectares Chile
2010s 1,272 Hectares 1,441 Hectares 169.64 Hectares Lao People's Democratic Republic
2020s 1,197 Hectares 1,224 Hectares 27 Hectares Lao People's Democratic Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Chile or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 1,224 Hectares against 1,197 Hectares in Chile as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Chile and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
27 Hectares, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Chile and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Chile ranks 94th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 92nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/chile/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/chile/lao-pdr/">Chile vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
242 places, 5,064 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. <br><br> Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.