Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Poland: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Democratic Republic of the Congo
13,477 Hectares
in 2020
Poland
10,921 Hectares
in 2020
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
34th
Poland rank
35th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Poland
05.0k10.0k15.0k200020102020

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 13,477 Hectares against 10,921 Hectares in Poland, a difference of 2,556 Hectares.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 1.2 times Poland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Poland ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 34th and Poland ranks 35th of 47 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Democratic Republic of the Congo averaged higher in 2 and Poland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 6,828 Hectares 12,622 Hectares 5,794 Hectares Poland
2010s 12,052 Hectares 10,924 Hectares 1,129 Hectares Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 13,477 Hectares 10,921 Hectares 2,556 Hectares Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Poland?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 13,477 Hectares against 10,921 Hectares in Poland as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Poland?
2,556 Hectares, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Poland?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Poland rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 34th and Poland ranks 35th of 47 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Poland: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/poland-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/poland-2/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Poland: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
242 places, 5,064 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.