India vs Least developed countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

India
155,369 Hectares
in 2020
Least developed countries
187,731 Hectares
in 2020
India rank
3rd
Least developed countries rank
5th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • India
  • Least developed countries
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k200020102020

How they compare

Least developed countries currently reports 187,731 Hectares against 155,369 Hectares in India, a difference of 32,362 Hectares.

That makes Least developed countries's figure about 1.2 times India's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was India ahead.

India ranks 3rd and Least developed countries ranks 5th of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, India averaged higher in 1 and Least developed countries in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Least developed countries Difference Ahead
2000s 159,321 Hectares 153,236 Hectares 6,086 Hectares India
2010s 156,291 Hectares 181,521 Hectares 25,230 Hectares Least developed countries
2020s 155,369 Hectares 187,731 Hectares 32,362 Hectares Least developed countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, India or Least developed countries?
Least developed countries, at 187,731 Hectares against 155,369 Hectares in India as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between India and Least developed countries?
32,362 Hectares, with Least developed countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Least developed countries?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do India and Least developed countries rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
India ranks 3rd and Least developed countries ranks 5th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Least developed countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/india/least-developed-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/india/least-developed-countries/">India vs Least developed countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
242 places, 5,064 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.