Moldova vs United States of America: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Moldova
1,700 Hectares
in 2020
United States of America
157,737 Hectares
in 2020
Moldova rank
19th
United States of America rank
2nd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Moldova
  • United States of America
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k200020102020

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 157,737 Hectares against 1,700 Hectares in Moldova, a difference of 156,037 Hectares.

That makes United States of America's figure about 92.8 times Moldova's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Moldova ranks 19th and United States of America ranks 2nd of 28 groups.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Moldova United States of America Difference Ahead
2000s 1,832 Hectares 167,456 Hectares 165,625 Hectares United States of America
2010s 1,756 Hectares 156,778 Hectares 155,022 Hectares United States of America
2020s 1,700 Hectares 157,737 Hectares 156,037 Hectares United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Moldova or United States of America?
United States of America, at 157,737 Hectares against 1,700 Hectares in Moldova as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Moldova and United States of America?
156,037 Hectares, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and United States of America?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Moldova and United States of America rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Moldova ranks 19th and United States of America ranks 2nd of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Moldova vs United States of America: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/moldova-2/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/moldova-2/united-states/">Moldova vs United States of America: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
242 places, 5,064 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.