Small Island Developing States vs Thailand: Africa's Development: Ecological sustainability Arable land

Small Island Developing States
6,676 Hectares
in 2020
Thailand
16,810 Hectares
in 2020
Small Island Developing States rank
17th
Thailand rank
19th

Africa's Development: Ecological sustainability Arable land over time

  • Small Island Developing States
  • Thailand
05.0k10.0k15.0k200020102020

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 16,810 Hectares against 6,676 Hectares in Small Island Developing States, a difference of 10,134 Hectares.

That makes Thailand's figure about 2.5 times Small Island Developing States's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.

Small Island Developing States ranks 17th and Thailand ranks 19th of 28 groups.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Small Island Developing States Thailand Difference Ahead
2000s 7,178 Hectares 15,357 Hectares 8,178 Hectares Thailand
2010s 6,803 Hectares 16,575 Hectares 9,772 Hectares Thailand
2020s 6,676 Hectares 16,810 Hectares 10,134 Hectares Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Small Island Developing States or Thailand?
Thailand, at 16,810 Hectares against 6,676 Hectares in Small Island Developing States as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Small Island Developing States and Thailand?
10,134 Hectares, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Small Island Developing States and Thailand?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Small Island Developing States and Thailand rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Small Island Developing States ranks 17th and Thailand ranks 19th of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Small Island Developing States vs Thailand: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/small-island-developing-states/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/small-island-developing-states/thailand/">Small Island Developing States vs Thailand: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
242 places, 5,064 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.