Spain vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Spain
11,639 Hectares
in 2020
Tanzania, United Republic of
13,502 Hectares
in 2020
Spain rank
29th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
26th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Spain
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
05.0k10.0k15.0k200020102020

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 13,502 Hectares against 11,639 Hectares in Spain, a difference of 1,863 Hectares.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.2 times Spain's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Spain ahead.

Spain ranks 29th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 26th of 172 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Spain averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Spain Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 12,862 Hectares 9,683 Hectares 3,179 Hectares Spain
2010s 12,255 Hectares 12,505 Hectares 249.62 Hectares Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 11,639 Hectares 13,502 Hectares 1,863 Hectares Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Spain or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 13,502 Hectares against 11,639 Hectares in Spain as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Spain and Tanzania, United Republic of?
1,863 Hectares, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Tanzania, United Republic of?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Spain and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Spain ranks 29th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 26th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Spain vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/spain/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-arable-land/spain/tanzania/">Spain vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Arable land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
242 places, 5,064 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. <br><br> Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.