Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Annual freshwater withdrawals

Equatorial Guinea
19.80 million billion cubic meters
in 2022
Sao Tome and Principe
40.90 million billion cubic meters
in 2022
Equatorial Guinea rank
172nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
169th

Annual freshwater withdrawals over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sao Tome and Principe
10.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M198720042022

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 40.90 million billion cubic meters against 19.80 million billion cubic meters in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 21.10 million billion cubic meters.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 2.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 172nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 169th of 181 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 15.12 million billion cubic meters 11.42 million billion cubic meters 3.70 million billion cubic meters Equatorial Guinea
2000s 19.08 million billion cubic meters 23.95 million billion cubic meters 4.87 million billion cubic meters Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 19.80 million billion cubic meters 37.80 million billion cubic meters 18.00 million billion cubic meters Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 19.80 million billion cubic meters 40.90 million billion cubic meters 21.10 million billion cubic meters Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual freshwater withdrawals, Equatorial Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 40.90 million billion cubic meters against 19.80 million billion cubic meters in Equatorial Guinea as of 2022.
What is the difference in annual freshwater withdrawals between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
21.10 million billion cubic meters, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2022.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for annual freshwater withdrawals?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 172nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 169th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Annual freshwater withdrawals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Annual freshwater withdrawals. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/annual-freshwater-withdrawals/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/annual-freshwater-withdrawals/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Annual freshwater withdrawals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual freshwater withdrawals
Unit
billion cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, FAO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
181 places, 6,284 data points, 1962–2022
Last refreshed

Annual freshwater withdrawals refer to total water withdrawals, not counting evaporation losses from storage basins, measured in cubic meters (m³) per year. Total water withdrawals are the sum of withdrawals for agriculture, industry and municipal (domestic uses). Withdrawals also include water from desalination plants in countries where they are a significant source.