Argentina vs Central Asia: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area

Argentina
587.46 1000 ha
in 2022
Central Asia
1,032 1000 ha
in 2022
Argentina rank
22nd
Central Asia rank
21st

Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area over time

  • Argentina
  • Central Asia
2004006008001.0k199220072022

How they compare

Central Asia currently reports 1,032 1000 ha against 587.46 1000 ha in Argentina, a difference of 444.54 1000 ha.

That makes Central Asia's figure about 1.8 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 22nd and Central Asia ranks 21st of 224 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Central Asia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Central Asia Difference Ahead
1990s 329.79 1000 ha 207.1 1000 ha 122.69 1000 ha Argentina
2000s 385.17 1000 ha 416.88 1000 ha 31.71 1000 ha Central Asia
2010s 498.25 1000 ha 684.2 1000 ha 185.95 1000 ha Central Asia
2020s 566.76 1000 ha 939.43 1000 ha 372.67 1000 ha Central Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area, Argentina or Central Asia?
Central Asia, at 1,032 1000 ha against 587.46 1000 ha in Argentina as of 2022.
What is the difference in artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area between Argentina and Central Asia?
444.54 1000 ha, with Central Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Central Asia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Argentina and Central Asia rank globally for artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area?
Argentina ranks 22nd and Central Asia ranks 21st of 224 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area from CCI_LC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Central Asia: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/artificial-surfaces-including-urban-and-associated-areas-area-from-cci-lc/argentina/central-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/artificial-surfaces-including-urban-and-associated-areas-area-from-cci-lc/argentina/central-asia/">Argentina vs Central Asia: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area from CCI_LC
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 8,231 data points, 1992–2022
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Land Cover data under the Agri-Environmental Indicators section contains land cover information organized by the land cover classes of the international standard system for Environmental and Economic Accounting Central Framework (SEEA CF). The land cover information is compiled from publicly available Global Land Cover (GLC) maps: a) MODIS land cover types based on the Land Cover Classification System, LCCS; b) The European Spatial Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) annual land cover maps produced by the Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)-Geomatics and now under the European Copernicus Program; c) The annual land cover maps which were produced under the European Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) (CGLS land cover, containing discrete land cover categorization), with spatial resolution 100m; and d) the WorldCover maps of the European Space Agency, produced at 10m resolution.