Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area

Cuba
67.33 1000 ha
in 2022
Zimbabwe
71.32 1000 ha
in 2022
Cuba rank
83rd
Zimbabwe rank
80th

Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area over time

  • Cuba
  • Zimbabwe
203040506070199220072022

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 71.32 1000 ha against 67.33 1000 ha in Cuba, a difference of 3.99 1000 ha.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 83rd and Zimbabwe ranks 80th of 224 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 44.36 1000 ha 27.7 1000 ha 16.66 1000 ha Cuba
2000s 52.8 1000 ha 33.64 1000 ha 19.17 1000 ha Cuba
2010s 62.28 1000 ha 46.43 1000 ha 15.86 1000 ha Cuba
2020s 66.17 1000 ha 68.25 1000 ha 2.08 1000 ha Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area, Cuba or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 71.32 1000 ha against 67.33 1000 ha in Cuba as of 2022.
What is the difference in artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
3.99 1000 ha, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area?
Cuba ranks 83rd and Zimbabwe ranks 80th of 224 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area from CCI_LC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/artificial-surfaces-including-urban-and-associated-areas-area-from-cci-lc/cuba/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/artificial-surfaces-including-urban-and-associated-areas-area-from-cci-lc/cuba/zimbabwe/">Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area from CCI_LC
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 8,231 data points, 1992–2022
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Land Cover data under the Agri-Environmental Indicators section contains land cover information organized by the land cover classes of the international standard system for Environmental and Economic Accounting Central Framework (SEEA CF). The land cover information is compiled from publicly available Global Land Cover (GLC) maps: a) MODIS land cover types based on the Land Cover Classification System, LCCS; b) The European Spatial Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) annual land cover maps produced by the Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)-Geomatics and now under the European Copernicus Program; c) The annual land cover maps which were produced under the European Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) (CGLS land cover, containing discrete land cover categorization), with spatial resolution 100m; and d) the WorldCover maps of the European Space Agency, produced at 10m resolution.