Ecuador vs Switzerland: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area

Ecuador
126.75 1000 ha
in 2022
Switzerland
137.9 1000 ha
in 2022
Ecuador rank
59th
Switzerland rank
56th

Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area over time

  • Ecuador
  • Switzerland
406080100120140199220072022

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 137.9 1000 ha against 126.75 1000 ha in Ecuador, a difference of 11.15 1000 ha.

That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 59th and Switzerland ranks 56th of 224 countries.

Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Switzerland Difference Ahead
1990s 53.75 1000 ha 73.93 1000 ha 20.18 1000 ha Switzerland
2000s 64.08 1000 ha 119.52 1000 ha 55.44 1000 ha Switzerland
2010s 101.81 1000 ha 134.58 1000 ha 32.77 1000 ha Switzerland
2020s 122.65 1000 ha 136.6 1000 ha 13.95 1000 ha Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area, Ecuador or Switzerland?
Switzerland, at 137.9 1000 ha against 126.75 1000 ha in Ecuador as of 2022.
What is the difference in artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area between Ecuador and Switzerland?
11.15 1000 ha, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Switzerland?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Ecuador and Switzerland rank globally for artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area?
Ecuador ranks 59th and Switzerland ranks 56th of 224 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area from CCI_LC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Switzerland: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/artificial-surfaces-including-urban-and-associated-areas-area-from-cci-lc/ecuador/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/artificial-surfaces-including-urban-and-associated-areas-area-from-cci-lc/ecuador/switzerland/">Ecuador vs Switzerland: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area from CCI_LC
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 8,231 data points, 1992–2022
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Land Cover data under the Agri-Environmental Indicators section contains land cover information organized by the land cover classes of the international standard system for Environmental and Economic Accounting Central Framework (SEEA CF). The land cover information is compiled from publicly available Global Land Cover (GLC) maps: a) MODIS land cover types based on the Land Cover Classification System, LCCS; b) The European Spatial Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) annual land cover maps produced by the Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)-Geomatics and now under the European Copernicus Program; c) The annual land cover maps which were produced under the European Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) (CGLS land cover, containing discrete land cover categorization), with spatial resolution 100m; and d) the WorldCover maps of the European Space Agency, produced at 10m resolution.