Georgia vs Mozambique: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area

Georgia
81.12 1000 ha
in 2022
Mozambique
88.03 1000 ha
in 2022
Georgia rank
76th
Mozambique rank
73rd

Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area over time

  • Georgia
  • Mozambique
20406080199220072022

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 88.03 1000 ha against 81.12 1000 ha in Georgia, a difference of 6.91 1000 ha.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 76th and Mozambique ranks 73rd of 224 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 3 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Mozambique Difference Ahead
1990s 43.66 1000 ha 26.4 1000 ha 17.26 1000 ha Georgia
2000s 56.8 1000 ha 36.14 1000 ha 20.66 1000 ha Georgia
2010s 74.39 1000 ha 51.18 1000 ha 23.2 1000 ha Georgia
2020s 79.86 1000 ha 79.95 1000 ha 0.09 1000 ha Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area, Georgia or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 88.03 1000 ha against 81.12 1000 ha in Georgia as of 2022.
What is the difference in artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area between Georgia and Mozambique?
6.91 1000 ha, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Mozambique?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Georgia and Mozambique rank globally for artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area?
Georgia ranks 76th and Mozambique ranks 73rd of 224 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area from CCI_LC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Mozambique: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/artificial-surfaces-including-urban-and-associated-areas-area-from-cci-lc/georgia/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/artificial-surfaces-including-urban-and-associated-areas-area-from-cci-lc/georgia/mozambique/">Georgia vs Mozambique: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area from CCI_LC
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 8,231 data points, 1992–2022
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Land Cover data under the Agri-Environmental Indicators section contains land cover information organized by the land cover classes of the international standard system for Environmental and Economic Accounting Central Framework (SEEA CF). The land cover information is compiled from publicly available Global Land Cover (GLC) maps: a) MODIS land cover types based on the Land Cover Classification System, LCCS; b) The European Spatial Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) annual land cover maps produced by the Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)-Geomatics and now under the European Copernicus Program; c) The annual land cover maps which were produced under the European Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) (CGLS land cover, containing discrete land cover categorization), with spatial resolution 100m; and d) the WorldCover maps of the European Space Agency, produced at 10m resolution.