Georgia vs Namibia: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area

Georgia
81.12 1000 ha
in 2022
Namibia
79.74 1000 ha
in 2022
Georgia rank
76th
Namibia rank
77th

Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area over time

  • Georgia
  • Namibia
020406080199220072022

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 81.12 1000 ha against 79.74 1000 ha in Namibia, a difference of 1.38 1000 ha.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 76th and Namibia ranks 77th of 219 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 43.66 1000 ha 39.92 1000 ha 3.75 1000 ha Georgia
2000s 56.8 1000 ha 50.74 1000 ha 6.06 1000 ha Georgia
2010s 74.39 1000 ha 59.03 1000 ha 15.36 1000 ha Georgia
2020s 79.86 1000 ha 79.07 1000 ha 0.79 1000 ha Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area, Georgia or Namibia?
Georgia, at 81.12 1000 ha against 79.74 1000 ha in Namibia as of 2022.
What is the difference in artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area between Georgia and Namibia?
1.38 1000 ha, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Namibia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Georgia and Namibia rank globally for artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area?
Georgia ranks 76th and Namibia ranks 77th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area from CCI_LC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Namibia: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/artificial-surfaces-including-urban-and-associated-areas-area-from-cci-lc/georgia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/artificial-surfaces-including-urban-and-associated-areas-area-from-cci-lc/georgia/namibia/">Georgia vs Namibia: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area from CCI_LC
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 8,231 data points, 1992–2022
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Land Cover data under the Agri-Environmental Indicators section contains land cover information organized by the land cover classes of the international standard system for Environmental and Economic Accounting Central Framework (SEEA CF). The land cover information is compiled from publicly available Global Land Cover (GLC) maps: a) MODIS land cover types based on the Land Cover Classification System, LCCS; b) The European Spatial Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) annual land cover maps produced by the Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)-Geomatics and now under the European Copernicus Program; c) The annual land cover maps which were produced under the European Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) (CGLS land cover, containing discrete land cover categorization), with spatial resolution 100m; and d) the WorldCover maps of the European Space Agency, produced at 10m resolution.