Israel vs Mozambique: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area

Israel
90.17 1000 ha
in 2022
Mozambique
88.03 1000 ha
in 2022
Israel rank
70th
Mozambique rank
73rd

Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area over time

  • Israel
  • Mozambique
20406080100199220072022

How they compare

Israel currently reports 90.17 1000 ha against 88.03 1000 ha in Mozambique, a difference of 2.14 1000 ha.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.

Israel ranks 70th and Mozambique ranks 73rd of 224 countries.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Mozambique Difference Ahead
1990s 31.29 1000 ha 26.4 1000 ha 4.89 1000 ha Israel
2000s 48.2 1000 ha 36.14 1000 ha 12.06 1000 ha Israel
2010s 69.72 1000 ha 51.18 1000 ha 18.54 1000 ha Israel
2020s 85.46 1000 ha 79.95 1000 ha 5.51 1000 ha Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area, Israel or Mozambique?
Israel, at 90.17 1000 ha against 88.03 1000 ha in Mozambique as of 2022.
What is the difference in artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area between Israel and Mozambique?
2.14 1000 ha, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Mozambique?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Israel and Mozambique rank globally for artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area?
Israel ranks 70th and Mozambique ranks 73rd of 224 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area from CCI_LC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Mozambique: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/artificial-surfaces-including-urban-and-associated-areas-area-from-cci-lc/israel/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/artificial-surfaces-including-urban-and-associated-areas-area-from-cci-lc/israel/mozambique/">Israel vs Mozambique: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area from CCI_LC
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 8,231 data points, 1992–2022
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Land Cover data under the Agri-Environmental Indicators section contains land cover information organized by the land cover classes of the international standard system for Environmental and Economic Accounting Central Framework (SEEA CF). The land cover information is compiled from publicly available Global Land Cover (GLC) maps: a) MODIS land cover types based on the Land Cover Classification System, LCCS; b) The European Spatial Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) annual land cover maps produced by the Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)-Geomatics and now under the European Copernicus Program; c) The annual land cover maps which were produced under the European Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) (CGLS land cover, containing discrete land cover categorization), with spatial resolution 100m; and d) the WorldCover maps of the European Space Agency, produced at 10m resolution.