Republic of Moldova vs United Republic of Tanzania: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area

Republic of Moldova
161.7 1000 ha
in 2022
United Republic of Tanzania
124.91 1000 ha
in 2022
Republic of Moldova rank
8th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
10th

Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area over time

  • Republic of Moldova
  • United Republic of Tanzania
50100150199220072022

How they compare

Republic of Moldova currently reports 161.7 1000 ha against 124.91 1000 ha in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 36.79 1000 ha.

That makes Republic of Moldova's figure about 1.3 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Republic of Moldova has been ahead every year.

Republic of Moldova ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 20 countries.

Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Moldova United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 80.58 1000 ha 29 1000 ha 51.58 1000 ha Republic of Moldova
2000s 139.32 1000 ha 45.17 1000 ha 94.15 1000 ha Republic of Moldova
2010s 159.71 1000 ha 71.85 1000 ha 87.86 1000 ha Republic of Moldova
2020s 160.99 1000 ha 112.06 1000 ha 48.93 1000 ha Republic of Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area, Republic of Moldova or United Republic of Tanzania?
Republic of Moldova, at 161.7 1000 ha against 124.91 1000 ha in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2022.
What is the difference in artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area between Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania?
36.79 1000 ha, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area?
Republic of Moldova ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area from CCI_LC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Moldova vs United Republic of Tanzania: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/artificial-surfaces-including-urban-and-associated-areas-area-from-cci-lc/republic-of-moldova/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/artificial-surfaces-including-urban-and-associated-areas-area-from-cci-lc/republic-of-moldova/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Republic of Moldova vs United Republic of Tanzania: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area from CCI_LC
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 8,231 data points, 1992–2022
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Land Cover data under the Agri-Environmental Indicators section contains land cover information organized by the land cover classes of the international standard system for Environmental and Economic Accounting Central Framework (SEEA CF). The land cover information is compiled from publicly available Global Land Cover (GLC) maps: a) MODIS land cover types based on the Land Cover Classification System, LCCS; b) The European Spatial Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) annual land cover maps produced by the Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)-Geomatics and now under the European Copernicus Program; c) The annual land cover maps which were produced under the European Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) (CGLS land cover, containing discrete land cover categorization), with spatial resolution 100m; and d) the WorldCover maps of the European Space Agency, produced at 10m resolution.